Literature DB >> 25366365

Post progression survival in glioblastoma: where are we?

Enrico Franceschi1, Mario Ermani, Stefania Bartolini, Marco Bartolotti, Rosalba Poggi, Giovanni Tallini, Gianluca Marucci, Antonio Fioravanti, Alicia Tosoni, Raffaele Agati, Antonella Bacci, Eugenio Pozzati, Luca Morandi, Damiano Balestrini, Claudio Ghimenton, Girolamo Crisi, Alba A Brandes.   

Abstract

The optimal end point for phase II studies for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is unclear and a matter of debate. Moreover, data about post-progression survival (PPS) after the first disease progression in GBM patients treated according to EORTC 26981/22981/NCIC CE.3 trial are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the PPS in GBM patients. The analysis was made with a database on 1,006 GBM patients followed prospectively between 06/2005 and 06/2010. Eligibility criteria for the study were: age ≥ 18 years; PS: 0-2; chemotherapy given at disease progression after RT/TMZ. 232 patients (mean age 52 years, range 18-77 years) were enrolled. The median PFS following second line chemotherapy (PFS2) was 2.5 months (95 % CI 2.1-2.9) and the rate of patients free of progression at 6 months (PFS2-6 mo), was 21.6 % (95 % CI 16.3-26.9 %). The median PPS was 8.6 months (95 % CI 7.4-9.8), PPS rates were: PPS-6: 66 % (95 % CI 60.3-72.9 %), PPS-9: 48.2 % (95 % CI 41.5-54.9 %) and PPS-12: 31.7 % (95 % CI 25.2-38.2 %). PPS in unselected patients treated with alkylating agents is about 8 months. PPS rates could be of interest as an end point in future studies in recurrent GBM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25366365     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1651-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  16 in total

1.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Walter Taal; Hendrika M Oosterkamp; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Laurens V Beerepoot; Monique C J Hanse; Jan Buter; Aafke H Honkoop; Dolf Boerman; Filip Y F de Vos; Winand N M Dinjens; Roelien H Enting; Martin J B Taphoorn; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Rob L H Jansen; Dieta Brandsma; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Irene van Heuvel; René M Vernhout; Bronno van der Holt; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  E T Wong; K R Hess; M J Gleason; K A Jaeckle; A P Kyritsis; M D Prados; V A Levin; W K Yung
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Predicting lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum.

Authors:  W A Palmisano; K K Divine; G Saccomanno; F D Gilliland; S B Baylin; J G Herman; S A Belinsky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Vinay K Puduvalli; Marc C Chamberlain; Martin J van den Bent; Antoine F Carpentier; Lawrence M Cher; Warren Mason; Michael Weller; Shengyan Hong; Luna Musib; Astra M Liepa; Donald E Thornton; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Melissa Wagner; Leighann Bailey; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; Paul Mulholland; Bart Neyns; L Burt Nabors; Mario Campone; Antje Wick; Warren Mason; Tom Mikkelsen; Surasak Phuphanich; Lynn S Ashby; John Degroot; Rao Gattamaneni; Lawrence Cher; Mark Rosenthal; Franz Payer; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Rakesh K Jain; A Gregory Sorensen; John Xu; Qi Liu; Martin van den Bent
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Henry S Friedman; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; James Vredenburgh; Jane Huang; Maoxia Zheng; Timothy Cloughesy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma: Where Are We to Date?

Authors:  Lidia Gatto; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Enrico Franceschi; Alicia Tosoni; Stefania Bartolini; Alba Ariela Brandes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  HER2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified Virus-Specific T Cells for Progressive Glioblastoma: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial.

Authors:  Nabil Ahmed; Vita Brawley; Meenakshi Hegde; Kevin Bielamowicz; Mamta Kalra; Daniel Landi; Catherine Robertson; Tara L Gray; Oumar Diouf; Amanda Wakefield; Alexia Ghazi; Claudia Gerken; Zhongzhen Yi; Aidin Ashoori; Meng-Fen Wu; Hao Liu; Cliona Rooney; Gianpietro Dotti; Adrian Gee; Jack Su; Yvonne Kew; David Baskin; Yi Jonathan Zhang; Pamela New; Bambi Grilley; Milica Stojakovic; John Hicks; Suzanne Z Powell; Malcolm K Brenner; Helen E Heslop; Robert Grossman; Winfried S Wels; Stephen Gottschalk
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Prospective prediction of clinical drug response in high-grade gliomas using an ex vivo 3D cell culture assay.

Authors:  Stephen Shuford; Lindsay Lipinski; Ajay Abad; Ashley M Smith; Melissa Rayner; Lauren O'Donnell; Jeremy Stuart; Laszlo L Mechtler; Andrew J Fabiano; Jeff Edenfield; Charles Kanos; Stephen Gardner; Philip Hodge; Michael Lynn; Nicholas A Butowski; Seunggu J Han; Navid Redjal; Howland E Crosswell; Cecile Rose T Vibat; Lillia Holmes; Matthew Gevaert; Robert A Fenstermaker; Teresa M DesRochers
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-05-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.