Literature DB >> 18355144

Optimizing robotic renal surgery: the lateral camera port placement technique and current results.

Ketan K Badani1, Fred Muhletaler, Michael Fumo, Sanjeev Kaul, James O Peabody, Mahendra Bhandari, Mani Menon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The successful completion of robot-assisted renal surgery requires optimal port placement in order to minimize arm collisions due to the bulky nature of the robotic system. We describe a novel technique of port placement to maximize range of motion during robotic renal surgery that has been used successfully in over 50 procedures and report on our results.
METHODS: Five primary ports are placed utilizing a 30 degrees lens facing upward. The camera is in the most laterally placed port between the anterior axillary line and the midclavicular line, 3 to 4 cm below the costal margin. Two 8-mm robotic ports are placed 10 to 11 cm away from the camera port, triangulated towards the kidney. Assistant ports, if desired, are located medially and placed supra- (12 mm) and infraumbilically (5 mm).
RESULTS: This technique resulted in the camera arm residing in an upward position, moving in a completely separate plane from the working robotic arms. We had no incidents of arm-camera collision in this position. We have used this port placement technique successfully in over 50 cases performed entirely robotically. We have had no need to change port location, redock the robotic system, or add additional ports during a procedure.
CONCLUSION: We report on a port placement technique for robotic renal surgery that optimizes motion of the robotic arms, while eliminating external collisions. Placement of the camera port laterally and robotic ports anteromedially results in considerable flexibility of robotic arm movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355144     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  Camera and trocar placement for robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy: which configuration provides optimal visualization and instrument mobility?

Authors:  Jose M Cabello; Sam B Bhayani; Robert S Figenshau; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-08-04

2.  Computer-assisted robotic renal surgery.

Authors:  Firas G Petros; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-06

3.  Preoperative planning method based on a MOPSO algorithm for robot-assisted cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Shuai Han; Hongqiang Sang; Fen Liu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Robotic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  C G Rogers; M Menon; E S Weise; M T Gettman; I Frank; D L Shephard; H M Abrahams; J M Green; D J Savatta; S B Bhayani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-07-26

5.  Comparison of robot-assisted nephrectomy with laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  Michelle Boger; Steven M Lucas; Sara C Popp; Thomas A Gardner; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Combined robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Manish N Patel; Daniel Eun; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: Has it come of age?

Authors:  Manish N Patel; Mahendra Bhandari; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.