Literature DB >> 18354424

Patenting and licensing in genetic testing.

S Aymé, G Matthijs, S Soini.   

Abstract

Patents for inventions can be beneficial for society, if they drive innovation and promote progress. In most areas, the patenting system works satisfactorily. However, it must be recognized that in some instances it can also be problematic; this is the case in the field of genetics, and particularly in the area of genetic testing. As patents should serve their original purpose (promoting innovation through a fair reward system for the inventors), the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) suggests ways to improve the mechanisms that already form part of the patents system as a whole. In brief, the ESHG recommends limiting the breadth of the claims in genetic patents and, more practically, to reduce the number of patents by limiting the patentable subject matter, thereby improving the quality of the patents that will eventually be granted. There is also a suggestion to redefine the concept of utility in patent law, by taking account of downstream clinical experience. The ESHG sees no harm in the patenting of novel technical tools for genetic testing (eg PCR or chip technologies), as they can promote investment and still allow for invention around them. Many disputes between supporters of the patenting system and the public revolve around ethical issues. The European Patent Office should consider the benefit of having an ethics committee to consider issues of major interest, such as patents applied to genes. The problem of licensing should also be addressed. Practically, this means supporting the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines, which prescribe that licenses should be non-exclusive and easily obtainable, both in practical and in financial terms. To promote this, the practical exploration of alternative models for licensing, like patent pools and clearinghouses, is a prerequisite. To better track developments in this field, the establishment of a voluntary reporting system, whereby geneticists could report on any issues related to new and/or old patents or licenses in the light of service provision to patients, would be worthwhile. Finally, the ESHG is calling upon all stakeholders to start the process of developing a code of conduct for partners with patents, covering ethical aspects as well as smooth licensing arrangements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18354424     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  4 in total

Review 1.  The fate and future of patents on human genes and genetic diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Isabelle Huys; Gert Matthijs; Geertrui Van Overwalle
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Legal uncertainty in the area of genetic diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Isabelle Huys; Nele Berthels; Gert Matthijs; Geertrui Van Overwalle
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Impact of gene patents on diagnostic testing: a new patent landscaping method applied to spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Nele Berthels; Gert Matthijs; Geertrui Van Overwalle
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Patents in genomics and human genetics.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher Heaney
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.