Literature DB >> 18353789

An analytical pipeline for genomic representations used for cytosine methylation studies.

Reid F Thompson1, Mark Reimers, Batbayar Khulan, Mathieu Gissot, Todd A Richmond, Quan Chen, Xin Zheng, Kami Kim, John M Greally.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Representations of the genome can be generated by the selection of a subpopulation of restriction fragments using ligation-mediated PCR. Such representations form the basis for a number of high-throughput assays, including the HELP assay to study cytosine methylation. We find that HELP data analysis is complicated not only by PCR amplification heterogeneity but also by a complex and variable distribution of cytosine methylation. To address this, we created an analytical pipeline and novel normalization approach that improves concordance between microarray-derived data and single locus validation results, demonstrating the value of the analytical approach. A major influence on the PCR amplification is the size of the restriction fragment, requiring a quantile normalization approach that reduces the influence of fragment length on signal intensity. Here we describe all of the components of the pipeline, which can also be applied to data derived from other assays based on genomic representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18353789      PMCID: PMC5061929          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  31 in total

1.  The human genome browser at UCSC.

Authors:  W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Methylation of mitochondrial DNA is not a useful marker for cancer detection.

Authors:  Masato Maekawa; Terumi Taniguchi; Hitomi Higashi; Haruhiko Sugimura; Kokichi Sugano; Takashi Kanno
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity. A morphological characterization.

Authors:  L J Romrell; A R Bellvé; D W Fawcett
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptosporidium parvum lack detectable DNA cytosine methylation.

Authors:  Mathieu Gissot; Sang-Woon Choi; Reid F Thompson; John M Greally; Kami Kim
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2008-01-04

5.  Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR.

Authors:  M F Polz; C M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  MspI, an isoschizomer of hpaII which cleaves both unmethylated and methylated hpaII sites.

Authors:  C Waalwijk; R A Flavell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mathias Ehrich; Matthew R Nelson; Patrick Stanssens; Marc Zabeau; Triantafillos Liloglou; George Xinarianos; Charles R Cantor; John K Field; Dirk van den Boom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genome-wide profiling of promoter methylation in human.

Authors:  I Hatada; M Fukasawa; M Kimura; S Morita; K Yamada; T Yoshikawa; S Yamanaka; C Endo; A Sakurada; M Sato; T Kondo; A Horii; T Ushijima; H Sasaki
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 9.  The epigenomics of cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Jones; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization.

Authors:  A R Bellvé; J C Cavicchia; C F Millette; D A O'Brien; Y M Bhatnagar; M Dym
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Statistical approaches for the analysis of DNA methylation microarray data.

Authors:  Kimberly D Siegmund
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Late-replicating heterochromatin is characterized by decreased cytosine methylation in the human genome.

Authors:  Masako Suzuki; Mayumi Oda; María-Paz Ramos; Marién Pascual; Kevin Lau; Edyta Stasiek; Frederick Agyiri; Reid F Thompson; Jacob L Glass; Qiang Jing; Richard Sandstrom; Melissa J Fazzari; R Scott Hansen; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Andrew S McLellan; John M Greally
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  DNA methylation signatures define molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Rita Shaknovich; Huimin Geng; Nathalie A Johnson; Lucas Tsikitas; Leandro Cerchietti; John M Greally; Randy D Gascoyne; Olivier Elemento; Ari Melnick
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Variability in DNA methylation defines novel epigenetic subgroups of DLBCL associated with different clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Nyasha Chambwe; Matthias Kormaksson; Huimin Geng; Subhajyoti De; Franziska Michor; Nathalie A Johnson; Ryan D Morin; David W Scott; Lucy A Godley; Randy D Gascoyne; Ari Melnick; Fabien Campagne; Rita Shaknovich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Cigarette smoking induces small airway epithelial epigenetic changes with corresponding modulation of gene expression.

Authors:  Lauren J Buro-Auriemma; Jacqueline Salit; Neil R Hackett; Matthew S Walters; Yael Strulovici-Barel; Michelle R Staudt; Jennifer Fuller; Mai Mahmoud; Christopher S Stevenson; Holly Hilton; Melisa W Y Ho; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Epigenomics: the science of no-longer-junk DNA. Why study it in chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Yi-An Ko; Katalin Susztak
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.299

7.  RFTS-deleted DNMT1 enhances tumorigenicity with focal hypermethylation and global hypomethylation.

Authors:  Bo-Kuan Wu; Szu-Chieh Mei; Charles Brenner
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Methylome profiling reveals distinct alterations in phenotypic and mutational subgroups of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Sangeeta Nischal; Sanchari Bhattacharyya; Maximilian Christopeit; Yiting Yu; Li Zhou; Tushar D Bhagat; Davendra Sohal; Britta Will; Yongkai Mo; Masako Suzuki; Animesh Pardanani; Michael McDevitt; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Ari M Melnick; John M Greally; Ulrich Steidl; Alison Moliterno; Amit Verma
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Cytosine methylation dysregulation in neonates following intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  Francine Einstein; Reid F Thompson; Tushar D Bhagat; Melissa J Fazzari; Amit Verma; Nir Barzilai; John M Greally
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-resolution genome-wide cytosine methylation profiling with simultaneous copy number analysis and optimization for limited cell numbers.

Authors:  Mayumi Oda; Jacob L Glass; Reid F Thompson; Yongkai Mo; Emmanuel N Olivier; Maria E Figueroa; Rebecca R Selzer; Todd A Richmond; Xinmin Zhang; Luke Dannenberg; Roland D Green; Ari Melnick; Eli Hatchwell; Eric E Bouhassira; Amit Verma; Masako Suzuki; John M Greally
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.