Literature DB >> 18351439

Comments in a discussion: differential rates of D- and L-tyrosine crystallization.

Meir Shinitzky1, David Deamer.   

Abstract

We earlier reported that we had observed quantifiable differences in crystallization rates of D and L tyrosine. It has been suggested that these results were due to the presence of impurities. Here we argue that it is premature to conclude that impurities entirely explain the results. More generally, there is an accumulating weight of evidence that D and L enantiomers display unexpected differences in their physical properties and behavior. These should be taken into account as we attempt to understand the origin of biochirality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18351439     DOI: 10.1007/s11084-008-9129-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph        ISSN: 0169-6149            Impact factor:   1.950


  10 in total

1.  Parity violating energetic difference and enantiomorphous crystalsp-caveats; reinvestigation of tyrosine crystallization.

Authors:  Meir Lahav; Isabelle Weissbuch; Edna Shavit; Clarissa Reiner; Graeme J Nicholson; Volker Schurig
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  TD-1HNMR measurements show enantioselective dissociation of ribose and glucose in the presence of H2(17)O.

Authors:  Romulus Ion Scorei; Vily Marius Cimpoiaşu; Radu Popa
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Enantiomeric excess of amino acids in hydrothermal environments.

Authors:  Atsushi Nemoto; Minako Horie; Ei-Ichi Imai; Hajime Honda; Kuniyuki Hatori; Koichiro Matsuno
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.950

4.  A hypothesis for the asymmetric appearance of biomolecules on earth.

Authors:  Y Yamagata
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Unexpected differences between D- and L- tyrosine lead to chiral enhancement in racemic mixtures.

Authors:  Meir Shinitzky; Fabio Nudelman; Yaniv Barda; Rachel Haimovitz; Effie Chen; David W Deamer
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  First experimental evidence for the preferential stabilization of the natural D- over the nonnatural L-configuration in nucleic acids.

Authors:  Sarah Bolik; Michael Rübhausen; Stephan Binder; Benjamin Schulz; Markus Perbandt; Nicolay Genov; Volker Erdmann; Sven Klussmann; Christian Betzel
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Subtle differences in structural transitions between poly-L- and poly-D-amino acids of equal length in water.

Authors:  Yosef Scolnik; Irina Portnaya; Uri Cogan; Saar Tal; Rachel Haimovitz; Mati Fridkin; Avshalom C Elitzur; David W Deamer; Meir Shinitzky
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  Experimental evidence leading to an alternative explanation of why D-tyrosine sometimes crystallizes faster than its L-enantiomer.

Authors:  Stanley I Goldberg
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 9.  Intrinsic asymmetries of amino acid enantiomers and their peptides: a possible role in the origin of biochirality.

Authors:  David W Deamer; Reay Dick; Wolfram Thiemann; Meir Shinitzky
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.437

10.  Chirality and helix stability of polyglutamic acid enantiomers.

Authors:  Eleftheria K Kodona; Charalambos Alexopoulos; Eugenia Panou-Pomonis; Philippos J Pomonis
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 8.128

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Enantiodifferent proton exchange in alanine and asparagine in the presence of H(2)(17)O.

Authors:  Vily Marius Cimpoiaşu; Romulus Ion Scorei; Radu Popa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.395

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.