PURPOSE: Optimal atrioventricular delay (AVD) setting for cardiac resynchronisation therapy, i.e. biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure, remains a formidable challenge. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different AVD on inter- and intra-ventricular resynchronisation using phase histograms of radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). METHODS: In 17 consecutive patients (mean age 64 +/- 6 years), RNV was performed 236 +/- 350 days after pacemaker implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Images were acquired during atrial pacing at 80 bpm and during biventricular pacing with AVD ranging from 80 to 160 ms. Inter-ventricular dyssynchrony was measured by the delay between the mean phase angles of the left and right ventricles. Intra-ventricular dyssynchrony was measured by the standard deviation (SD) of left ventricular phase histograms. RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was inversely correlated to LV dyssynchrony (SD of LV phase histogram, R = -0.82, p < 0.0001). However, the increase in LVEF by biventricular pacing (mean +4.4 +/- 4%) showed only modest correlation to the resulting resynchronisation effect (characterised by a -13 +/- 8 degrees decrease in LV phase histogram SD, R = -0.38, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: RNV is helpful in optimising pacing parameters for resynchronisation therapy. Varying AVD did not have a major impact on intra- or inter-ventricular resynchronisation. Thus, the benefit of AVD-based LVEF optimisation seems to result from atrioventricular resynchronisation.
PURPOSE: Optimal atrioventricular delay (AVD) setting for cardiac resynchronisation therapy, i.e. biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure, remains a formidable challenge. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different AVD on inter- and intra-ventricular resynchronisation using phase histograms of radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). METHODS: In 17 consecutive patients (mean age 64 +/- 6 years), RNV was performed 236 +/- 350 days after pacemaker implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Images were acquired during atrial pacing at 80 bpm and during biventricular pacing with AVD ranging from 80 to 160 ms. Inter-ventricular dyssynchrony was measured by the delay between the mean phase angles of the left and right ventricles. Intra-ventricular dyssynchrony was measured by the standard deviation (SD) of left ventricular phase histograms. RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was inversely correlated to LV dyssynchrony (SD of LV phase histogram, R = -0.82, p < 0.0001). However, the increase in LVEF by biventricular pacing (mean +4.4 +/- 4%) showed only modest correlation to the resulting resynchronisation effect (characterised by a -13 +/- 8 degrees decrease in LV phase histogram SD, R = -0.38, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: RNV is helpful in optimising pacing parameters for resynchronisation therapy. Varying AVD did not have a major impact on intra- or inter-ventricular resynchronisation. Thus, the benefit of AVD-based LVEF optimisation seems to result from atrioventricular resynchronisation.
Authors: Alain Bernheim; Peter Ammann; Christian Sticherling; Peter Burger; Beat Schaer; Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Jens Eckstein; Stephanie Kiencke; Christoph Kaiser; Andre Linka; Peter Buser; Matthias Pfisterer; Stefan Osswald Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-05-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Ji Chen; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P Stokkel; Gabe B Bleeker; Claudia Ypenburg; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marc Vanderheyden; Tine De Backer; Maximo Rivero-Ayerza; Peter Geelen; Jozef Bartunek; Sofie Verstreken; Mark De Zutter; Marc Goethals Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: C Stellbrink; O A Breithardt; A Franke; S Sack; P Bakker; A Auricchio; T Pochet; R Salo; A Kramer; J Spinelli Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A Auricchio; C Stellbrink; M Block; S Sack; J Vogt; P Bakker; H Klein; A Kramer; J Ding; R Salo; B Tockman; T Pochet; J Spinelli Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-06-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W F Kerwin; E H Botvinick; J W O'Connell; S H Merrick; T DeMarco; K Chatterjee; K Scheibly; L A Saxon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hugues Bader; Stephane Garrigue; Stephane Lafitte; Sylvain Reuter; Pierre Jaïs; Michel Haïssaguerre; Jacques Bonnet; Jacques Clementy; Raymond Roudaut Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-01-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Richard W Wassenaar Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 5.952