Literature DB >> 18349779

Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.

Ivo Schuster1, Jan Korner, Michael Arzdorf, Karsten Schwieger, Gerd Diederichs, Berend Linke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the bone-implant-anchorage of 90-degree double-plate osteosynthesis in simulated complete intra-articular distal humerus fractures using conventional reconstruction plates (CRP), locking compression plates (LCP), and distal humerus plates (DHP), depending on the bone mineral density (BMD) of the cadaver specimens.
METHODS: Groups (CRP, LCP, DHP, n=8; LCP, DHP, n=13) in distal humerus cadaver bones were created based on BMD. The fracture model was an unstable intraarticular distal humerus fracture with a transverse osteotomy gap representing metaphyseal comminution (AO type 13-C2.3). Flexion and extension stiffness as well as cycles until failure due to screw pullout under cyclic loading were evaluated. Estimates of BMD values, below which failure was likely to occur, were determined.
RESULTS: Stiffness values were not significantly different between groups (extension: P=0.881, flexion: P=0.547). Under cyclic loading, consistent screw pullout failure occurred at BMD values below about 400 mg/cm for CRP and below about 300 mg/cm for LCP constructs. Comparing BMD-matched groups of 8 and 13 specimens respectively, the failure rate was significantly lower for the DHP (0/8) than for the CRP (5/8; P=0.026) and tended to be lower for the DHP (0/13) as compared to the LCP (4/13; P=0.096).
CONCLUSION: Bone-implant anchorage was different between locking and nonlocking plate constructs and depended on BMD. While in good bone quality implant choice was not critical, both locking plates provided superior resistance against screw loosening as compared to the CRP at low BMD values (<420 mg/cm). Based on our laboratory results, we conclude that locking plates such as the LCP and DHP are constructs designed to keep anatomical reduction in the presence of comminution and poor bone quality in a low intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349779     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181632cf8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  21 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Patrick A Varady; Christian von Rüden; Markus Greinwald; Sven Hungerer; Robert Pätzold; Peter Augat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical testing of a novel osteosynthesis plate for the ulnar coronoid process.

Authors:  Johannes Kiene; Jorn Bogun; Nina Brockhaus; Klaus Waizner; Arndt-Peter Schulz; Robert Wendlandt
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-05-06

4.  Locking and Non-locking Constructs Achieve Similar Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes for Internal Fixation of Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Marschall Berkes; Grant Garrigues; John Solic; Nathan Van Zeeland; Nader Shourbaji; Kim Brouwer; Jesse Jupiter; David Ruch; William T Obremskey
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-15

Review 5.  Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus-a review of the current practice.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras; Efthymios Papasoulis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Outcome after internal fixation of intraarticular distal humerus (AO type B & C) fractures: Preliminary results with anatomical distal humerus LCP system.

Authors:  Jwalant Patel; Girish Motwani; Himanshu Shah; Rajeev Daveshwar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-02-15

7.  Arthroplasty compared to internal fixation by locking plate osteosynthesis in comminuted fractures of the distal humerus.

Authors:  Alexander Ellwein; Helmut Lill; Christine Voigt; Pauline Wirtz; Gunnar Jensen; Jan Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Parallel versus orthogonal plate osteosynthesis of adult distal humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Wei-Ren Su; Wei-Chin Lin; Tai-Wei Tai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of distal humeral fractures using conventional implants. Biomechanical evaluation of a new implant configuration.

Authors:  Markus Windolf; Edgardo Ramos Maza; Boyko Gueorguiev; Volker Braunstein; Karsten Schwieger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Biomechanical testing of a new plate system for the distal humerus compared to two well-established implants.

Authors:  Christine Voigt; Christina Rank; Klaus Waizner; Robert Wendlandt; Andreas Unger; Arndt P Schulz; Christian Jürgens; Felix Renken
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.