Literature DB >> 18349094

How to interpret a genome-wide association study.

Thomas A Pearson1, Teri A Manolio.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies use high-throughput genotyping technologies to assay hundreds of thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and relate them to clinical conditions and measurable traits. Since 2005, nearly 100 loci for as many as 40 common diseases and traits have been identified and replicated in GWA studies, many in genes not previously suspected of having a role in the disease under study, and some in genomic regions containing no known genes. GWA studies are an important advance in discovering genetic variants influencing disease but also have important limitations, including their potential for false-positive and false-negative results and for biases related to selection of study participants and genotyping errors. Although these studies are clearly many steps removed from actual clinical use, and specific applications of GWA findings in prevention and treatment are actively being pursued, at present these studies mainly represent a valuable discovery tool for examining genomic function and clarifying pathophysiologic mechanisms. This article describes the design, interpretation, application, and limitations of GWA studies for clinicians and scientists for whom this evolving science may have great relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349094     DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  320 in total

Review 1.  Part 1: background, methodology, and clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 2.  Genome-wide association studies of chronic kidney disease: what have we learned?

Authors:  Conall M O'Seaghdha; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Contribution of the IBD5 locus to inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Xi Wang; Hong Yang; Dong Wu; Li Wang; Jiaming Qian
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Intervention, integration and translation in obesity research: Genetic, developmental and metaorganismal approaches.

Authors:  Maureen A O'Malley; Karola Stotz
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 5.  Genetic bases of stuttering: the state of the art, 2011.

Authors:  Shelly Jo Kraft; Ehud Yairi
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  Molecular Genetics and Economics.

Authors:  Jonathan P Beauchamp; David Cesarini; Magnus Johannesson; Matthijs J H M van der Loos; Philipp D Koellinger; Patrick J F Groenen; James H Fowler; J Niels Rosenquist; A Roy Thurik; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Does familial clustering of risk factors for long-term diabetic complications leave any place for genes that act independently?

Authors:  Andrew D Paterson; Shelley B Bull
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Curve-based multivariate distance matrix regression analysis: application to genetic association analyses involving repeated measures.

Authors:  Rany M Salem; Daniel T O'Connor; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.107

9.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Dynamic data during hypotensive episode improves mortality predictions among patients with sepsis and hypotension.

Authors:  Louis Mayaud; Peggy S Lai; Gari D Clifford; Lionel Tarassenko; Leo Anthony Celi; Djillali Annane
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.