Literature DB >> 18348694

Bone morphometry strongly predicts cortical bone stiffness and strength, but not toughness, in inbred mouse models of high and low bone mass.

Romain Voide1, G Harry van Lenthe, Ralph Müller.   

Abstract

Inbred strains of mice make useful models to study bone properties. Our aim was to compare bone competence and cortical morphometric parameters of two inbred strains to better determine the role of bone structure and geometry in the process of bone failure. Morphometric analysis was performed on 20 murine femora with a low bone mass (C57BL/6J; B6) and 20 murine femora with a high bone mass (C3H/HeJ; C3H) using desktop microCT. The bones were tested under three-point bending to measure their mechanical properties. Results showed that the C3H strain is a more reproducible model regarding bone morphometric and mechanical phenotypes than the B6 strain. Bone strength, stiffness, yield force, yield displacement, and toughness, as well as morphometric traits, were all significantly different between the two strains, whereas postyield displacement was not. It was found that bone volume, cortical thickness, and cross-sectional area predicted almost 80% (p < 0.05) of bone stiffness, strength, and yield force. Nevertheless, cortical bone postyield properties such as bone toughness could not be explained by morphometry, but postyield whitening was observed in that phase. In conclusion, we found that morphometric parameters are strong predictors of preyield but not postyield properties. The lack of morphometric influence on bone competence in the postyield phase in combination with the observed postyield whitening confirmed the important contribution of ultrastructure and microdamage in the process of overall bone failure behavior, especially in the postyield phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18348694     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  17 in total

1.  Follistatin-like 3 is a mediator of exercise-driven bone formation and strengthening.

Authors:  J Nam; P Perera; R Gordon; Y H Jeong; A D Blazek; D G Kim; B C Tee; Z Sun; T D Eubank; Y Zhao; B Lablebecioglu; S Liu; A Litsky; N L Weisleder; B S Lee; T Butterfield; A L Schneyer; S Agarwal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Hierarchical microimaging of bone structure and function.

Authors:  Ralph Müller
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  The role of GH/IGF-I-mediated mechanisms in sex differences in cortical bone size in mice.

Authors:  Lisa E Olson; Claes Ohlsson; Subburaman Mohan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Establishing biomechanical mechanisms in mouse models: practical guidelines for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in the diaphyses of long bones.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Matthew J Silva; Deepak Vashishth; X Edward Guo; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Detection of bone loss via subchondral bone analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Vimort; Antonio Ruellas; Jack Prothero; J S Marron; Matthew McCormick; Lucia Cevidanes; Erika Benavides; Beatriz Paniagua
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03-12

Review 6.  Mechanical Characterization of Bone: State of the Art in Experimental Approaches-What Types of Experiments Do People Do and How Does One Interpret the Results?

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Bone morphology in 46 BXD recombinant inbred strains and femur-tibia correlation.

Authors:  Yueying Zhang; Jinsong Huang; Yan Jiao; Valentin David; Mehmet Kocak; Esra Roan; Denis Di'Angelo; Lu Lu; Karen A Hasty; Weikuan Gu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-25

8.  Fully automated segmentation of callus by micro-CT compared to biomechanics.

Authors:  Oliver Bissinger; Carolin Götz; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Peter Michael Prodinger; Thomas Tischer
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Development of an efficient screening system to identify novel bone metabolism-related genes using the exchangeable gene trap mutagenesis mouse models.

Authors:  Syuji Kurogi; Tomohisa Sekimoto; Taro Funamoto; Tomomi Ota; Shihoko Nakamura; Takuya Nagai; Mai Nakahara; Kumiko Yoshinobu; Kimi Araki; Masatake Araki; Etsuo Chosa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Differential effects of collagen prolyl 3-hydroxylation on skeletal tissues.

Authors:  Erica P Homan; Caressa Lietman; Ingo Grafe; Jennifer Lennington; Roy Morello; Dobrawa Napierala; Ming-Ming Jiang; Elda M Munivez; Brian Dawson; Terry K Bertin; Yuqing Chen; Rhonald Lua; Olivier Lichtarge; John Hicks; Mary Ann Weis; David Eyre; Brendan H L Lee
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.