PURPOSE: The identification of a molecular signature predicting the relapse of tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancers should help the therapeutic management of estrogen receptor-positive cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A series of 132 primary tumors from patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen were analyzed for expression profiles at the whole-genome level by 70-mer oligonucleotide microarrays. A supervised analysis was done to identify an expression signature. RESULTS: We defined a 36-gene signature that correctly classified 78% of patients with relapse and 80% of relapse-free patients (79% accuracy). Using 23 independent tumors, we confirmed the accuracy of the signature (78%) whose relevance was further shown by using published microarray data from 60 tamoxifen-treated patients (63% accuracy). Univariate analysis using the validation set of 83 tumors showed that the 36-gene classifier is more efficient in predicting disease-free survival than the traditional histopathologic prognostic factors and is as effective as the Nottingham Prognostic Index or the "Adjuvant!" software. Multivariate analysis showed that the molecular signature is the only independent prognostic factor. A comparison with several already published signatures demonstrated that the 36-gene signature is among the best to classify tumors from both training and validation sets. Kaplan-Meier analyses emphasized its prognostic power both on the whole cohort of patients and on a subgroup with an intermediate risk of recurrence as defined by the St. Gallen criteria. CONCLUSION: This study identifies a molecular signature specifying a subgroup of patients who do not gain benefits from tamoxifen treatment. These patients may therefore be eligible for alternative endocrine therapies and/or chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: The identification of a molecular signature predicting the relapse of tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancers should help the therapeutic management of estrogen receptor-positive cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A series of 132 primary tumors from patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen were analyzed for expression profiles at the whole-genome level by 70-mer oligonucleotide microarrays. A supervised analysis was done to identify an expression signature. RESULTS: We defined a 36-gene signature that correctly classified 78% of patients with relapse and 80% of relapse-free patients (79% accuracy). Using 23 independent tumors, we confirmed the accuracy of the signature (78%) whose relevance was further shown by using published microarray data from 60 tamoxifen-treated patients (63% accuracy). Univariate analysis using the validation set of 83 tumors showed that the 36-gene classifier is more efficient in predicting disease-free survival than the traditional histopathologic prognostic factors and is as effective as the Nottingham Prognostic Index or the "Adjuvant!" software. Multivariate analysis showed that the molecular signature is the only independent prognostic factor. A comparison with several already published signatures demonstrated that the 36-gene signature is among the best to classify tumors from both training and validation sets. Kaplan-Meier analyses emphasized its prognostic power both on the whole cohort of patients and on a subgroup with an intermediate risk of recurrence as defined by the St. Gallen criteria. CONCLUSION: This study identifies a molecular signature specifying a subgroup of patients who do not gain benefits from tamoxifen treatment. These patients may therefore be eligible for alternative endocrine therapies and/or chemotherapy.
Authors: Lodewyk F A Wessels; Marcel J T Reinders; Augustinus A M Hart; Cor J Veenman; Hongyue Dai; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: James F Reid; Lara Lusa; Loris De Cecco; Danila Coradini; Silvia Veneroni; Maria Grazia Daidone; Manuela Gariboldi; Marco A Pierotti Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tucker A Patterson; Edward K Lobenhofer; Stephanie B Fulmer-Smentek; Patrick J Collins; Tzu-Ming Chu; Wenjun Bao; Hong Fang; Ernest S Kawasaki; Janet Hager; Irina R Tikhonova; Stephen J Walker; Liang Zhang; Patrick Hurban; Francoise de Longueville; James C Fuscoe; Weida Tong; Leming Shi; Russell D Wolfinger Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cheng Fan; Daniel S Oh; Lodewyk Wessels; Britta Weigelt; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Andrew B Nobel; Laura J van't Veer; Charles M Perou Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sherene Loi; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christine Desmedt; Françoise Lallemand; Andrew M Tutt; Cheryl Gillet; Paul Ellis; Adrian Harris; Jonas Bergh; John A Foekens; Jan G M Klijn; Denis Larsimont; Marc Buyse; Gianluca Bontempi; Mauro Delorenzi; Martine J Piccart; Christos Sotiriou Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xiao-Jun Ma; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Wilson Wang; Li Ding; Dennis C Sgroi; Richard A Bender; C Kent Osborne; D Craig Allred; Mark G Erlander Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew E Teschendorff; Ali Naderi; Nuno L Barbosa-Morais; Sarah E Pinder; Ian O Ellis; Sam Aparicio; James D Brenton; Carlos Caldas Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: D J Brennan; D P O'Connor; H Laursen; S F McGee; S McCarthy; R Zagozdzon; E Rexhepaj; A C Culhane; F M Martin; M J Duffy; G Landberg; L Ryden; S M Hewitt; M J Kuhar; R Bernards; R C Millikan; J P Crown; K Jirström; W M Gallagher Journal: Oncogene Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Qiyuan Li; Aron C Eklund; Nicolai Juul; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christopher T Workman; Andrea L Richardson; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paolo Uva; Luigi Aurisicchio; James Watters; Andrey Loboda; Amit Kulkarni; John Castle; Fabio Palombo; Valentina Viti; Giuseppe Mesiti; Valentina Zappulli; Laura Marconato; Francesca Abramo; Gennaro Ciliberto; Armin Lahm; Nicola La Monica; Emanuele de Rinaldis Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2009-03-27 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Julie A Vendrell; Katherine E Robertson; Patrice Ravel; Susan E Bray; Agathe Bajard; Colin A Purdie; Catherine Nguyen; Sirwan M Hadad; Ivan Bieche; Sylvie Chabaud; Thomas Bachelot; Alastair M Thompson; Pascale A Cohen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: N Khodarev; R Ahmad; H Rajabi; S Pitroda; T Kufe; C McClary; M D Joshi; D MacDermed; R Weichselbaum; D Kufe Journal: Oncogene Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 9.867