Literature DB >> 18343699

Self-contacts in Asx and Glx residues of high-resolution protein structures: role of local environment and tertiary interactions.

Tuhin Kumar Pal1, Ramasubbu Sankararamakrishnan.   

Abstract

In protein structures, side-chains of asparagine and aspartic acid (Asx) and glutamine and glutamic acid (Glx) can approach their own backbone nitrogen or carbonyl group. We have systematically analyzed intra-residue contacts in Asx and Glx residues and their secondary structure preferences in two different datasets consisting of 500 and 1506 high-resolution structures. Intra-residue contact in an Asx/Glx residue between the heavy atoms of side-chain and main-chain functional groups of the same residue was investigated irrespective of whether such contacts are due to hydrogen bonding or not. Our search yielded 563 and 1462 cases of self-contacting Asx and Glx residues from the two datasets. Two important observations have been made in this analysis. First, self-contacts involving side-chain oxygen and backbone nitrogen atoms in majority of Asx residues are not due to hydrogen bonds. In the second instance, surprisingly, side-chain and backbone carbonyl oxygens of a significant number of Asx and Glx residues approach each other. For a wide-range of accessible surface areas, self-contacting residues are surrounded by less number of polar groups compared to all other Asx/Glx residues. In buried and partially buried regions, side-chain and main-chain functional groups of these residues together participate in simultaneous interactions with the available polar groups or water molecules. Asx/Glx residues with self-contacts are rarely observed in the middle of an alpha-helix or a beta-strand. Asx/Glx side-chain having contact with its own backbone nitrogen shows different capping preferences compared to those having contact with its backbone oxygen. Examples of proteins with multiple self-contacting Asx/Glx residues are found. We speculate that mutation of a self-contacting residue in the buried or partially buried region of a protein will destabilize the structure. The results of this analysis will help in engineering protein structures and site-directed mutagenesis experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18343699     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Graph Model        ISSN: 1093-3263            Impact factor:   2.518


  8 in total

1.  Open-channel structures of the human glycine receptor α1 full-length transmembrane domain.

Authors:  David D Mowrey; Tanxing Cui; Yuanyuan Jia; Dejian Ma; Alexander M Makhov; Peijun Zhang; Pei Tang; Yan Xu
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Unconventional N-H…N Hydrogen Bonds Involving Proline Backbone Nitrogen in Protein Structures.

Authors:  R N V Krishna Deepak; Ramasubbu Sankararamakrishnan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Interplay of hydrogen bonds and n→π* interactions in proteins.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Robert W Newberry; Brett VanVeller; Ronald T Raines; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  The VSGB 2.0 model: a next generation energy model for high resolution protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Jianing Li; Robert Abel; Kai Zhu; Yixiang Cao; Suwen Zhao; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-22

5.  Structural basis for relief of phospholamban-mediated inhibition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase at saturating Ca2+ conditions.

Authors:  Eli Fernández-de Gortari; L Michel Espinoza-Fonseca
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Murine startle mutant Nmf11 affects the structural stability of the glycine receptor and increases deactivation.

Authors:  Megan E Wilkins; Alex Caley; Marc C Gielen; Robert J Harvey; Trevor G Smart
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  On the satisfaction of backbone-carbonyl lone pairs of electrons in protein structures.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Reciprocal carbonyl-carbonyl interactions in small molecules and proteins.

Authors:  Abdur Rahim; Pinaki Saha; Kunal Kumar Jha; Nagamani Sukumar; Bani Kanta Sarma
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.