Literature DB >> 18342224

Randomized controlled trial of an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor in patients with advanced heart failure: the COMPASS-HF study.

Robert C Bourge1, William T Abraham, Philip B Adamson, Mark F Aaron, Juan M Aranda, Anthony Magalski, Michael R Zile, Andrew L Smith, Frank W Smart, Mark A O'Shaughnessy, Mariell L Jessup, Brandon Sparks, David L Naftel, Lynne Warner Stevenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a heart failure (HF) management strategy using continuous intracardiac pressure monitoring could decrease HF morbidity.
BACKGROUND: Patients with HF may experience frequent decompensations that require hospitalization despite intensive treatment and follow-up.
METHODS: The COMPASS-HF (Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure) study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled trial of 274 New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF patients who received an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor. Patients were randomized to a Chronicle (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 134) or control (n = 140) group. All patients received optimal medical therapy, but the hemodynamic information from the monitor was used to guide patient management only in the Chronicle group. Primary end points included freedom from system-related complications, freedom from pressure-sensor failure, and reduction in the rate of HF-related events (hospitalizations and emergency or urgent care visits requiring intravenous therapy).
RESULTS: The 2 safety end points were met with no pressure-sensor failures and system-related complications in only 8% of the 277 patients who underwent implantation (all but 4 complications were successfully resolved). The primary efficacy end point was not met because the Chronicle group had a nonsignificant 21% lower rate of all HF-related events compared with the control group (p = 0.33). A retrospective analysis of the time to first HF hospitalization showed a 36% reduction (p = 0.03) in the relative risk of a HF-related hospitalization in the Chronicle group.
CONCLUSIONS: The implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor-guided care did not significantly reduce total HF-related events compared with optimal medical management. Additional trials will be necessary to establish the clinical benefit of implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor-guided care in patients with advanced HF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18342224     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  134 in total

1.  Left ventricular epicardial admittance measurement for detection of acute LV dilation.

Authors:  John E Porterfield; Erik R Larson; James T Jenkins; Daniel Escobedo; Jonathan W Valvano; John A Pearce; Marc D Feldman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-12-09

Review 2.  Remote hemodynamic monitoring for ambulatory left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Brent C Lampert; Sitaramesh Emani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Remote heart failure monitoring.

Authors:  William T Abraham
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-10

Review 4.  Drugs' development in acute heart failure: what went wrong?

Authors:  Vincenzo Teneggi; Nithy Sivakumar; Deborah Chen; Alex Matter
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Aetiology, timing and clinical predictors of early vs. late readmission following index hospitalization for acute heart failure: insights from ASCEND-HF.

Authors:  Marat Fudim; Christopher M O'Connor; Allison Dunning; Andrew P Ambrosy; Paul W Armstrong; Adrian Coles; Justin A Ezekowitz; Stephen J Greene; Marco Metra; Randall C Starling; Adriaan A Voors; Adrian F Hernandez; G Michael Felker; Robert J Mentz
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 6.  Updates in heart failure 30-day readmission prevention.

Authors:  David Goldgrab; Kathir Balakumaran; Min Jung Kim; Sara R Tabtabai
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Ambulatory monitoring of congestive heart failure by multiple bioelectric impedance vectors.

Authors:  Dirar S Khoury; Mihir Naware; Jeff Siou; Andreas Blomqvist; Nilesh S Mathuria; Jianwen Wang; Hue-Teh Shih; Sherif F Nagueh; Dorin Panescu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Therapeutic implications of implantable device-based monitoring of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Eric Popjes; John P Boehmer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-09

Review 9.  Implantable devices to monitor patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Nikolaos Karamichalakis; John Parissis; George Bakosis; Vasiliki Bistola; Ignatios Ikonomidis; Antonios Sideris; Gerasimos Filippatos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  LV-MEMS: A New Challenger Against the CHAMPION?

Authors:  Kiyotake Ishikawa
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.