BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hyperintensities on T2-weighted images are seen in the brains of most patients with neurofibromatosis type I (NF-1), but the origin of these unidentified bright objects (UBOs) remains obscure. In the current study, we examined the diffusion characteristics of brain tissue in children with NF-1 to test the hypothesis that a microstructural abnormality is present in NF-1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 50 children with NF-1 and 8 controls. Circular regions of interest were manually placed in 7 standardized locations in both hemispheres, including UBO sites. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), and axial anisotropy (A(m)) were used to differentiate quantitatively between healthy and disordered brain matter. Differences in eigenvalues (lambda(1), lambda(2), lambda(3)) were determined to examine parenchymal integrity. RESULTS: We found higher ADC values for UBOs than for normal-appearing sites (P < .01) and higher ADC values for normal-appearing sites than for controls (P < .04 in 5 of 7 regions). In most regions, we found no differences in FA or A(m). Eigenvalues lambda(2) and lambda(3) were higher at UBO sites than in normal-appearing sites (P < .04). CONCLUSION: With ADC, it was possible to differentiate quantitatively between normal- and abnormal-appearing brain matter in NF-1 and also between normal-appearing brain matter in NF-1 and healthy brain matter in controls, indicating subtle pathologic damage disrupting the tissue microstructure in the NF-1 brain. Higher diffusivity for lambda(1), lambda(2), and lambda(3) indicates that this disturbance of microstructure is caused by accumulation of fluid or vacuolation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hyperintensities on T2-weighted images are seen in the brains of most patients with neurofibromatosis type I (NF-1), but the origin of these unidentified bright objects (UBOs) remains obscure. In the current study, we examined the diffusion characteristics of brain tissue in children with NF-1 to test the hypothesis that a microstructural abnormality is present in NF-1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 50 children with NF-1 and 8 controls. Circular regions of interest were manually placed in 7 standardized locations in both hemispheres, including UBO sites. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), and axial anisotropy (A(m)) were used to differentiate quantitatively between healthy and disordered brain matter. Differences in eigenvalues (lambda(1), lambda(2), lambda(3)) were determined to examine parenchymal integrity. RESULTS: We found higher ADC values for UBOs than for normal-appearing sites (P < .01) and higher ADC values for normal-appearing sites than for controls (P < .04 in 5 of 7 regions). In most regions, we found no differences in FA or A(m). Eigenvalues lambda(2) and lambda(3) were higher at UBO sites than in normal-appearing sites (P < .04). CONCLUSION: With ADC, it was possible to differentiate quantitatively between normal- and abnormal-appearing brain matter in NF-1 and also between normal-appearing brain matter in NF-1 and healthy brain matter in controls, indicating subtle pathologic damage disrupting the tissue microstructure in the NF-1 brain. Higher diffusivity for lambda(1), lambda(2), and lambda(3) indicates that this disturbance of microstructure is caused by accumulation of fluid or vacuolation.
Authors: J J Neil; S I Shiran; R C McKinstry; G L Schefft; A Z Snyder; C R Almli; E Akbudak; J A Aronovitz; J P Miller; B C Lee; T E Conturo Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sheng-Kwei Song; Jun Yoshino; Tuan Q Le; Shiow-Jiuan Lin; Shu-Wei Sun; Anne H Cross; Regina C Armstrong Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Pratik Mukherjee; Jeffrey H Miller; Joshua S Shimony; Joseph V Philip; Deepika Nehra; Abraham Z Snyder; Thomas E Conturo; Jeffrey J Neil; Robert C McKinstry Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E L Wignall; P D Griffiths; N G Papadakis; I D Wilkinson; L I Wallis; O Bandmann; P E E Cowell; N Hoggard Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gulhan Ertan; Elcin Zan; David M Yousem; Can Ceritoglu; Aylin Tekes; Andrea Poretti; Thierry A G M Huisman Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2014-09-25
Authors: Camille Chabernaud; Maarten Mennes; Peter G Kardel; William D Gaillard; M Layne Kalbfleisch; John W Vanmeter; Roger J Packer; Michael P Milham; Francisco X Castellanos; Maria T Acosta Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: José R L Ferraz-Filho; Antônio J da Rocha; Marcos P Muniz; Antônio S Souza; Eny M Goloni-Bertollo; Erika C Pavarino-Bertelli Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2011-10-28
Authors: Marieke Klein; Marjolein van Donkelaar; Ellen Verhoef; Barbara Franke Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Christopher G Filippi; Aaron Bos; Joshua P Nickerson; Michael B Salmela; Chris J Koski; Keith A Cauley Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2011-08-21
Authors: Sahayini Arulrajah; Gulhan Ertan; Lori Jordan; Aylin Tekes; Elizabeth Khaykin; Izlem Izbudak; Thierry A G M Huisman Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Steffie N Tomson; Matthew J Schreiner; Manjari Narayan; Tena Rosser; Nicole Enrique; Alcino J Silva; Genevera I Allen; Susan Y Bookheimer; Carrie E Bearden Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 5.038