BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Eccentric stenosis of the coronary artery is associated with plaque disruption and acute coronary syndrome. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether eccentric stenosis of the carotid artery contributes to cerebrovascular events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 6859 patients with vascular diseases who underwent duplex carotid ultrasonography, we studied 512 internal carotid arteries in 441 patients who had a maximum area stenosis at or more than 70%, which corresponds with approximately 50% or more by the NASCET method. The maximal (A) and minimal wall thicknesses (B) were measured on cross-sectional sonography images, and an eccentricity index was calculated using the following formula: (A - B)/A. Arteries in the lowest quartile of the eccentricity index (<0.69) were defined as having a concentric stenosis, whereas the others were defined as having eccentric stenosis. The underlying clinical characteristics and plaque morphologies, as well as the occurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the preceding year, were compared between patients with eccentric and concentric stenosis. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and plaque morphology were similar between the 2 groups. Cerebrovascular events occurred more frequently ipsilaterally to the artery with eccentric stenosis (13.5%) than to the artery with concentric stenosis (5.5%; P = .013); the difference was more evident when cerebrovascular events of presumed carotid arterial origin were assessed (P = .005). After adjusting for risk factors and plaque morphology, eccentric stenosis was independently related to the presence of recent cerebrovascular events (odds ratio = 2.76; 95% confidence interval = 1.19-6.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an area carotid stenosis of 70% or more, eccentric plaque was associated with a significantly increased incidence of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events compared with patients with concentric stenosis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Eccentric stenosis of the coronary artery is associated with plaque disruption and acute coronary syndrome. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether eccentric stenosis of the carotid artery contributes to cerebrovascular events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 6859 patients with vascular diseases who underwent duplex carotid ultrasonography, we studied 512 internal carotid arteries in 441 patients who had a maximum area stenosis at or more than 70%, which corresponds with approximately 50% or more by the NASCET method. The maximal (A) and minimal wall thicknesses (B) were measured on cross-sectional sonography images, and an eccentricity index was calculated using the following formula: (A - B)/A. Arteries in the lowest quartile of the eccentricity index (<0.69) were defined as having a concentric stenosis, whereas the others were defined as having eccentric stenosis. The underlying clinical characteristics and plaque morphologies, as well as the occurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the preceding year, were compared between patients with eccentric and concentric stenosis. RESULTS:Patient characteristics and plaque morphology were similar between the 2 groups. Cerebrovascular events occurred more frequently ipsilaterally to the artery with eccentric stenosis (13.5%) than to the artery with concentric stenosis (5.5%; P = .013); the difference was more evident when cerebrovascular events of presumed carotid arterial origin were assessed (P = .005). After adjusting for risk factors and plaque morphology, eccentric stenosis was independently related to the presence of recent cerebrovascular events (odds ratio = 2.76; 95% confidence interval = 1.19-6.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an area carotid stenosis of 70% or more, eccentric plaque was associated with a significantly increased incidence of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events compared with patients with concentric stenosis.
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Louis R Caplan; J Donald Easton; Pierre B Fayad; J P Mohr; Jeffrey L Saver; David G Sherman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edward G Grant; Carol B Benson; Gregory L Moneta; Andrei V Alexandrov; J Dennis Baker; Edward I Bluth; Barbara A Carroll; Michael Eliasziw; John Gocke; Barbara S Hertzberg; Sandra Katanick; Laurence Needleman; John Pellerito; Joseph F Polak; Kenneth S Rholl; Douglas L Wooster; R Eugene Zierler Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Caroline Cheng; Dennie Tempel; Rien van Haperen; Arjen van der Baan; Frank Grosveld; Mat J A P Daemen; Rob Krams; Rini de Crom Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Ojio; H Takatsu; T Tanaka; K Ueno; K Yokoya; T Matsubara; T Suzuki; S Watanabe; N Morita; M Kawasaki; T Nagano; I Nishio; K Sakai; K Nishigaki; G Takemura; T Noda; S Minatoguchi; H Fujiwara Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Feiyu Li; Mary McGrae McDermott; Debiao Li; Timothy J Carroll; Daniel S Hippe; Christopher M Kramer; Zhaoyang Fan; Xihai Zhao; Thomas S Hatsukami; Baocheng Chu; Jinnan Wang; Chun Yuan Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Peng-Peng Niu; Yao Yu; Hong-Wei Zhou; Yang Liu; Yun Luo; Zhen-Ni Guo; Hang Jin; Yi Yang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tamar S Polonsky; Kiang Liu; Lu Tian; James Carr; Timothy J Carroll; Jarett Berry; Michael H Criqui; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Melina R Kibbe; Christopher M Kramer; Feiyu Li; Dongxiang Xu; Xihao Zhao; Chun Yuan; Mary M McDermott Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 5.162