Literature DB >> 21468749

Comparison of carotid arterial morphology and plaque composition between patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study.

Qingjun Wang1, Yuan Zeng, Yong Wang, Jianming Cai, Youquan Cai, Lin Ma, Xian Xu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in carotid arterial morphology and plaque composition between patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Twenty-eight patients (12 ACS patients and 16 SCAD patients) underwent carotid high-resolution MRI examination using a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI scanner. The indicators of carotid arterial morphology included the maximum total vessel area (Max-TVA), mean TVA, minimum lumen area (Min-LA), mean LA, maximum wall area (Max-WA), mean WA, maximum wall thickness (Max-WT), mean WT, maximum normalized wall index (Max-NWI), mean NWI, and maximum stenosis (Max-stenosis). The indicators of plaque composition included the prevalence and mean area percentage (%) of lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), calcification (Ca), intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and fibrous cap rupture (FCR). None of the indicators of carotid arterial morphology had significant differences (all P > 0.05) between the ACS and SCAD patients. The prevalence and plaque composition area percentage of LRNC, Ca, and IPH did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups. However, carotid plaques in the ACS patients presented a higher prevalence of FCR than SCAD patients (P < 0.05). This study revealed a similar carotid arterial morphology between ACS and SCAD patients. However, FCR is more common in carotid plaques with ACS than in those with SCAD. Ruptured carotid plaques may be a forewarning factor for those patients who are at high risk of ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21468749     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9858-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  35 in total

Review 1.  Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: a multifocal disease.

Authors:  Ward Casscells; Morteza Naghavi; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Update on clinical imaging of coronary plaque in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Angela S Koh; Stanley Chia
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Characterisation of carotid atheroma in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients using high resolution MRI.

Authors:  J M U-King-Im; T Y Tang; A Patterson; M J Graves; S Howarth; Z-Y Li; R Trivedi; D Bowden; P J Kirkpatrick; M E Gaunt; E A Warburton; N M Antoun; J H Gillard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  The carotid artery plaque size and echogenicity are related to different cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly: the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study.

Authors:  Jessika Andersson; Johan Sundström; Lisa Kurland; Thomas Gustavsson; Johannes Hulthe; Anders Elmgren; Kersti Zilmer; Mihkel Zilmer; Lars Lind
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.880

5.  Evidence of a chronic systemic cause of instability of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; R Villagra; R Gibson; R C Donders; C P Warlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; Shao-xiong Zhang; Nayak L Polissar; Denise Echelard; Geraldo Ortiz; Joseph W Davis; Elizabeth Ellington; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries.

Authors:  S Glagov; C Zarins; D P Giddens; D N Ku
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Saam; Jianming Cai; Lin Ma; You-Quan Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Atherosclerotic plaque imaging by carotid MRI.

Authors:  Xihai Zhao; Zachary E Miller; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study.

Authors:  Baocheng Chu; Annette Kampschulte; Marina S Ferguson; William S Kerwin; Vasily L Yarnykh; Kevin D O'Brien; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  6 in total

1.  Beyond stenotic degree assessment in carotid atherosclerotic lesions: single catheter near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Brian B Ghoshhajra; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Clinical value of black-blood high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for intracranial atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Haiqing Yang; Yifei Zhu; Zuojun Geng; Caiying Li; Lixia Zhou; Q I Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Celastrol may have an anti-atherosclerosis effect in a rabbit experimental carotid atherosclerosis model.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Cai Li; Xiao-Ping Jin; Shou-Xiang Weng; Li-Long Fan; Zhou Zheng; Wei-Ling Li; Feng Wang; Wan-Fen Wang; Xiao-Fei Hu; Chen-Ling Lv; Peng Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

4.  Intra-individual comparison of carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaque features with in vivo MR plaque imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Helck; Nicola Bianda; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Daniel S Hippe; Maximilian F Reiser; Augusto Gallino; Rolf Wyttenbach; Tobias Saam
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Comparative analysis of general characteristics of ischemic stroke of BAD and non-BAD CISS subtypes.

Authors:  Bin Mei; Guang-Zhi Liu; Yang Yang; Yu-Min Liu; Jiang-Hui Cao; Jun-Jian Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-16

Review 6.  Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.