Literature DB >> 18338490

Negligible advantages and excess costs of routine addition of breast ultrasonography to mammography in dense breasts.

Beniamino Brancato1, Rita Bonardi, Sandra Catarzi, Chiara Iacconi, Gabriella Risso, Renzo Taschini, Stefano Ciatto.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the role of breast ultrasonography as a complement to negative mammography in radiologically dense breasts.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of a total series of 49,044 consecutive mammograms reported as negative in asymptomatic women, 25,665 (52.3%) were coded as dense (BI-RADS D3-4) and ultrasonography was recommended. Due to organizational problems, ultrasonography was performed immediately or within 1 month only in 5,227 cases, representing the study series.
RESULTS: Two cancers were detected at immediate ultrasonography (0.03%). The cancer detection rate in women aged 40-49 and 50-69 years was 0.002% and 0.07%, respectively. The benign biopsy rate was 0.5% for core biopsies and 0.02% for surgical biopsies. The cost per ultrasonography-assessed woman was Euro 56.05, whereas the cost per additional mammographically occult but ultrasonography-detected cancer was Euro 146,496.53. The mammograms of the 2 cancer cases underwent blind review by an expert reader and were confirmed as negative. DISCUSSION: Our findings show a low cancer detection rate, substantially lower compared to other clinical studies of ultrasonography in dense breasts, though in accordance with preliminary evidence from an Italian randomized clinical trial within a population-based screening program. The policy of adding ultrasonography to negative mammography in dense breasts seems to have very limited cost-effectiveness, and should not be adopted in routine practice before results of ongoing clinical trials are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18338490     DOI: 10.1177/030089160709300608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  11 in total

1.  Benefits of double reading of screening mammograms: retrospective study on a consecutive series.

Authors:  F Caumo; S Brunelli; M Zorzi; I Baglio; S Ciatto; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Janie M Lee; Brian L Sprague; Christoph I Lee; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram.

Authors:  Paulo Almazy Zanello; Andre Felipe Cica Robim; Tatiane Mendes Gonçalves de Oliveira; Jorge Elias Junior; Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade; Carlos Ribeiro Monteiro; Joaquim Moraes Sarmento Filho; Helio Humberto Angotti Carrara; Valdair Francisco Muglia
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Breast cancer screening: Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with unilateral mammography-negative dense breasts.

Authors:  Atoosa Adibi; Maryam Golshahi; Mehri Sirus; Kimia Kazemi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Valentina Assi; Adam Brentnall; Dharmishta Parmar; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The contribution of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of breast tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K Kalmantis; C Dimitrakakis; Ch Koumpis; A Tsigginou; N Papantoniou; S Mesogitis; A Antsaklis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009

9.  Utility of supplemental screening with breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue who are not at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Geetika A Klevos; Fernando Collado-Mesa; Jose M Net; Monica M Yepes
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

10.  Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Shengfeng Wang; Liwen Zhang; Chao Sheng; Fengju Song; Ping Wang; Yubei Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.