Literature DB >> 18338460

Brain activity accompanying perception of implied motion in abstract paintings.

Chai-Youn Kim1, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

Early 20th century artists including Duchamp and Balla tried to portray moving objects on a static canvas by superimposing objects in successive portrayals of an action. We investigated whether implied motion in those paintings is associated with activation of motion-sensitive area MT+. In Experiment 1, we found that observers rated these kinds of paintings higher in portraying motion than they did other abstract paintings in which motion is not intended. We also found that observers who had previously experienced abstract paintings with implied motion tended to give higher motion ratings to that class of paintings. In Experiment 2, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain activity of observers while viewing abstract paintings receiving the highest and the lowest motion rating scores in Experiment 1. We found MT+, but not primary visual cortex (V1), showed greater BOLD responses to abstract paintings with implied motion than to abstract paintings with little motion impression, but only in observers with prior experience viewing those kinds of paintings. These results imply that the neural machinery ordinarily engaged during perception of real visual motion is activated when people view paintings explicitly designed to convey a sense of visual motion. Experience, however, is necessary to achieve this sense of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18338460     DOI: 10.1163/156856807782758395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  15 in total

1.  Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Time dilation caused by static images with implied motion.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamamoto; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Movement in Aesthetic Experiences: What We Can Learn from Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Stacey Humphries; Jacqueline Rick; Daniel Weintraub; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study).

Authors:  Sandra Becker-Bense; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Peter zu Eulenburg; Christoph Best; Peter Bartenstein; Matthias Schreckenberger; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Corticomotor Excitability during Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art.

Authors:  Fortunato Battaglia; Sarah H Lisanby; David Freedberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Artistic explorations of the brain.

Authors:  Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Area V5-a microcosm of the visual brain.

Authors:  Semir Zeki
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Visiting Richard Serra's "Promenade" sculpture improves postural control and judgment of subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Alexandre Lang; Thanh-Thuan Lê; Marie-Sarah Adenis; Qing Yang; Gabi Lipede; Marine Vernet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-12

9.  Anticipatory smooth eye movements in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Cordelia D Aitkin; Elio M Santos; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sensitivity to differences in the motor origin of drawings: from human to robot.

Authors:  Helena De Preester; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.