PURPOSE: This study was performed to clarify the role of perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) at 3 Tesla in the characterisation of haemodynamic heterogeneity within gliomas and surrounding tissues and in the differentiation of high-grade from low-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 36 patients with histologically verified gliomas (25 with high-grade and 11 with low-grade gliomas). PWI was performed by first-pass gadopentetate dimeglumine T2*-weighted echo-planar images, and cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps were computed with a nondiffusible tracer model. Relative CBV (rCBV) was calculated by dividing CBV in pathological areas by that in contralateral white matter. RESULTS: In high-grade gliomas, rCBV were markedly increased in mass [mean+/-standard deviation (SD), 4.3+/-1.2] and margins (4.0+/-1.1) and reduced in necrotic areas (0.3+/-0.3). Oedematous-appearing areas were divided in two groups according to signal intensity on T2-weighted images: tumour with lower (nearly isointense to grey matter) and oedema with higher (scarcely isointense to cerebrospinal fluid) signal intensity. Tumour showed significantly higher rCBV than did oedema (1.8+/-0.5 vs. 0.5+/-0.2; p<0.001) areas. In low-grade gliomas, mass (2.0+/-1.5) and margin (2.2+/-1.2) rCBV were significantly lower than in high-grade gliomas (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three-Tesla PWI helps to distinguish necrosis from tumour mass, infiltrating tumour from oedema and high-grade from low-grade gliomas. It enhances the magnetic resonance (MR) assessment of cerebral gliomas and provides useful information for planning surgical and radiation treatment.
PURPOSE: This study was performed to clarify the role of perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) at 3 Tesla in the characterisation of haemodynamic heterogeneity within gliomas and surrounding tissues and in the differentiation of high-grade from low-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 36 patients with histologically verified gliomas (25 with high-grade and 11 with low-grade gliomas). PWI was performed by first-pass gadopentetate dimeglumine T2*-weighted echo-planar images, and cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps were computed with a nondiffusible tracer model. Relative CBV (rCBV) was calculated by dividing CBV in pathological areas by that in contralateral white matter. RESULTS: In high-grade gliomas, rCBV were markedly increased in mass [mean+/-standard deviation (SD), 4.3+/-1.2] and margins (4.0+/-1.1) and reduced in necrotic areas (0.3+/-0.3). Oedematous-appearing areas were divided in two groups according to signal intensity on T2-weighted images: tumour with lower (nearly isointense to grey matter) and oedema with higher (scarcely isointense to cerebrospinal fluid) signal intensity. Tumour showed significantly higher rCBV than did oedema (1.8+/-0.5 vs. 0.5+/-0.2; p<0.001) areas. In low-grade gliomas, mass (2.0+/-1.5) and margin (2.2+/-1.2) rCBV were significantly lower than in high-grade gliomas (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three-Tesla PWI helps to distinguish necrosis from tumour mass, infiltrating tumour from oedema and high-grade from low-grade gliomas. It enhances the magnetic resonance (MR) assessment of cerebral gliomas and provides useful information for planning surgical and radiation treatment.
Authors: Soonmee Cha; Edmond A Knopp; Glyn Johnson; Stephan G Wetzel; Andrew W Litt; David Zagzag Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tommaso Scarabino; Alberto Maiorana; Francesco Nemore; Giuseppe Maria Giannatempo; Teresa Popolizio; Alessandra Stranieri; Mario Cammisa Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: M Principi; M Italiani; A Guiducci; I Aprile; M Muti; G Giulianelli; P Ottaviano Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: I Aprile; M Muti; M Principi; N Bartolini; A Zenoni; G Tazza; M Italiani; P Ottaviano Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; T Hirai; T Okuda; Y Shigematsu; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Christoph Moenninghoff; Stefan Maderwald; Jens M Theysohn; Oliver Kraff; Mark E Ladd; Nicolai El Hindy; Johannes van de Nes; Michael Forsting; Isabel Wanke Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: George A Alexiou; Spyridon Tsiouris; Athanasios P Kyritsis; Spyridon Voulgaris; Maria I Argyropoulou; Andreas D Fotopoulos Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: S Chawla; J Krejza; A Vossough; Y Zhang; G S Kapoor; S Wang; D M O'Rourke; E R Melhem; H Poptani Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Scarabino; T Popolizio; F Trojsi; G Giannatempo; S Pollice; N Maggialetti; A Carriero; A Di Costanzo; G Tedeschi; U Salvolini Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Max-Ludwig Schäfer; Martin H Maurer; Michael Synowitz; Joost Wüstefeld; Tim Marnitz; Florian Streitparth; Edzard Wiener Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-05-19 Impact factor: 5.315