Z Guo1, T M Gill, H G Allore. 1. Yale University, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Researchers have often used rather simple approaches to analyze repeated time-to-event health conditions that either examine time to the first event or treat multiple events as independent. More sophisticated models have been developed, although previous applications have focused largely on such outcomes having continuous risk intervals. Limitations of applying these models include their difficulty in implementation without careful attention to forming the data structures. METHODS: We first review time-to-event models for repeated events that are extensions of the Cox model and frailty models. Next, we develop a way to efficiently set up the data structures with discontinuous risk intervals for such models, which are more appropriate for many applications than the continuous alternatives. Finally, we apply these models to a real dataset to investigate the effect of gender on functional disability in a cohort of older persons. For comparison, we demonstrate modeling time to the first event. RESULTS: The GEE Poisson, the Cox counting process, and the frailty models provided similar parameter estimates of gender effect on functional disability, that is, women had increased risk of bathing disability and other disability (disability in walking, dressing, or transferring) as compared to men. These results, especially for other disabilities, were quite different from those provided by an analysis of the first-event outcomes. However, the effect of gender was no longer significant in the counting process model fully adjusted for covariates. CONCLUSION: Modeling time to only the first event may not be adequate. After properly setting up the data structures, repeated event models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects can be easily implemented with common statistical software packages.
OBJECTIVES: Researchers have often used rather simple approaches to analyze repeated time-to-event health conditions that either examine time to the first event or treat multiple events as independent. More sophisticated models have been developed, although previous applications have focused largely on such outcomes having continuous risk intervals. Limitations of applying these models include their difficulty in implementation without careful attention to forming the data structures. METHODS: We first review time-to-event models for repeated events that are extensions of the Cox model and frailty models. Next, we develop a way to efficiently set up the data structures with discontinuous risk intervals for such models, which are more appropriate for many applications than the continuous alternatives. Finally, we apply these models to a real dataset to investigate the effect of gender on functional disability in a cohort of older persons. For comparison, we demonstrate modeling time to the first event. RESULTS: The GEE Poisson, the Cox counting process, and the frailty models provided similar parameter estimates of gender effect on functional disability, that is, women had increased risk of bathing disability and other disability (disability in walking, dressing, or transferring) as compared to men. These results, especially for other disabilities, were quite different from those provided by an analysis of the first-event outcomes. However, the effect of gender was no longer significant in the counting process model fully adjusted for covariates. CONCLUSION: Modeling time to only the first event may not be adequate. After properly setting up the data structures, repeated event models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects can be easily implemented with common statistical software packages.
Authors: Judy Y Ou; Rochelle R Smits-Seemann; Sapna Kaul; Mark N Fluchel; Carol Sweeney; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Tae Hyun Jung; Peter Peduzzi; Heather Allore; Tassos C Kyriakides; Denise Esserman Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Juarez R Braga; Jack V Tu; Peter C Austin; Rinku Sutradhar; Heather J Ross; Douglas S Lee Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2018-01-01
Authors: Shiow-Wen Yang; Mary A Kernic; Beth A Mueller; Gregory E Simon; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Ann Vander Stoep Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Paul C Nathan; Mohammad Agha; Jason D Pole; David Hodgson; Astrid Guttmann; Rinku Sutradhar; Mark L Greenberg Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.442