Literature DB >> 18337366

How do brain areas communicate during the processing of noxious stimuli? An analysis of laser-evoked event-related potentials using the Granger causality index.

Thomas Weiss1, Wolfram Hesse, Mihaela Ungureanu, Holger Hecht, Lutz Leistritz, Herbert Witte, Wolfgang H R Miltner.   

Abstract

Several imaging techniques have identified different brain areas involved in the processing of noxious stimulation and thus in the constitution of pain. However, only little is known how these brain areas communicate with one another after activation by stimulus processing and which areas directionally affect or modulate the activity of succeeding areas. One measure for the analysis of such interactions is represented by the Granger Causality Index (GCI). In applying time-varying bivariate and partial variants of this concept (tvGCI), the aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction of neural activities between a set of scalp electrodes that best represent the brain electrical neural activity of major cortical areas involved in the processing of noxious laser-heat stimuli and their variation in time. Bivariate and partial tvGCIs were calculated within four different intervals of laser-evoked event-related potentials (LEPs) including a baseline period prior to stimulus application and three intervals immediately following stimulus application, i.e., between 170 and 200 ms (at the N2 component), between 260 and 320 ms (P2 component), and between 320 and 400 ms (P3 component of LEPs). Results show some similarities, but also some striking differences between bivariate and partial tvGCIs. These differences might be explained by the nature of bivariate and partial tvGCIs. However, both tvGCI approaches revealed a directed interaction between medial and lateral electrodes of the centroparietal region. This result was interpreted as a directed interaction between the anterior cingulate cortex and the secondary somatosensory cortex and the insula, structures that are significantly involved in the constitution of pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18337366     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00912.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Granger causal influence predicts BOLD activity levels in the default mode network.

Authors:  Qing Jiao; Guangming Lu; Zhiqiang Zhang; Yuan Zhong; Zhengge Wang; Yongxin Guo; Kai Li; Mingzhou Ding; Yijun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Temporal Information of Directed Causal Connectivity in Multi-Trial ERP Data using Partial Granger Causality.

Authors:  Vahab Youssofzadeh; Girijesh Prasad; Muhammad Naeem; KongFatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-01

3.  EEG analysis reveals widespread directed functional interactions related to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus.

Authors:  T Markman; C C Liu; J H Chien; N E Crone; J Zhang; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spectral and spatial changes of brain rhythmic activity in response to the sustained thermal pain stimulation.

Authors:  Clara Huishi Zhang; Abbas Sohrabpour; Yunfeng Lu; Bin He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Functional integration within the human pain system as revealed by Granger causality.

Authors:  Markus Ploner; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Understanding the time variant connectivity of the language network in developmental dyslexia: new insights using Granger causality.

Authors:  Carolin Ligges; M Ungureanu; M Ligges; B Blanz; H Witte
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Increased activity imbalance in fronto-subcortical circuits in adolescents with major depression.

Authors:  Qing Jiao; Jun Ding; Guangming Lu; Linyan Su; Zhiqiang Zhang; Zhengge Wang; Yuan Zhong; Kai Li; Mingzhou Ding; Yijun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Time-varying MVAR algorithms for directed connectivity analysis: Critical comparison in simulations and benchmark EEG data.

Authors:  Mattia F Pagnotta; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Network redundancy analysis of effective brain networks: a comparison of healthy controls and patients with major depression.

Authors:  Lutz Leistritz; Thomas Weiss; Karl-Jürgen Bär; Fabrizio De VicoFallani; Fabio Babiloni; Herbert Witte; Thomas Lehmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.