Literature DB >> 18335438

Facial augmentation with porous polyethylene (Medpor)--histological evidence of intense foreign body reaction.

Martin Gosau1, Florian G Draenert, Stefan Ihrler.   

Abstract

In a previous study by our group evaluating the clinical use of Medpor implants as augmentation material in the facial skeleton, we examined cases with unexpected intense foreign body reaction and focal disintegration of the implant material. The present study evaluates the histological findings in the largest series of explanted Medpor samples from human beings so far. Altogether 10 samples were harvested during revision surgery due to aesthetic contouring or due to infection. The average time from implantation to removal of the implants was 8.1 months. Paraffin embedding was employed for improved histological analysis. Chronic inflammation and foreign body giant cell reaction were seen in all cases. Intracytoplasmatic phagocytosis of disintegrated pieces of Medpor was seen as well as focal destruction of the material. From the histological point of view it is no longer justified to regard Medpor as an immunologically inert material. Nevertheless the reaction does not seem to be severe enough to compromise the stability and volume of the implant from a clinical point of view. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18335438     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  10 in total

1.  [Tissue engineering using porous polyethylene implants].

Authors:  S Strieth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Treatment of Infected Facial Implants.

Authors:  Kriti Mohan; Joshua A Cox; Ryan M Dickey; Paula Gravina; Anthony Echo; Shayan A Izaddoost; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Imaging of cosmetic facial implants and grafts.

Authors:  C J Schatz; D T Ginat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Use of HDPE implants in facial skeletal augmentation: Should we rush for it?

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2010-01

Review 5.  Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures--complications, outcome, and review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gosau; Moritz Schöneich; Florian G Draenert; Tobias Ettl; Oliver Driemel; Torsten E Reichert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Scaffold-Assisted Artificial Hair Implantation in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Joshua K Au; Miguel Fernando Palma Diaz; Tara Aghaloo; Maie A St John
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Porous high-density polyethylene in facial reconstruction and revision rhinoplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shabahang Mohammadi; Shadi Ghourchian; Farzad Izadi; Ahmad Daneshi; Aslan Ahmadi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Histologic changes of implanted gore bio-a in an experimental animal model.

Authors:  Kwan Koo Yeo; Tae Hwan Park; Jin Hyuk Park; Choong Hyun Chang; June-Kyu Kim; Sang Won Seo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  TNF-α-Inhibition Improves the Biocompatibility of Porous Polyethylene Implants In Vivo.

Authors:  Timon Hussain; Donata Gellrich; Svenja Siemer; Christoph A Reichel; Jonas Eckrich; Dimo Dietrich; Shirley K Knauer; Roland H Stauber; Sebastian Strieth
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Long-term infectious complications of using porous polyethylene mesh for orbital fracture reconstruction.

Authors:  Xuefei Song; Lunhao Li; Yiyuan Sun; Xianqun Fan; Zhengkang Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.