Literature DB >> 18334912

Apolipoprotein E genotypes are associated with lipid-lowering responses to statin treatment in diabetes: a Go-DARTS study.

Louise A Donnelly1, Colin N A Palmer, Adrian L Whitley, Chim Choy Lang, Alex S F Doney, Andrew D Morris, Peter T Donnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes have been associated with variations in plasma-lipid levels and with response to statins, although the influence of APOE on the response to statins remains controversial, especially in patients with diabetes. We sought to evaluate the association of the APOE genotype with the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc)-lowering response to statins, in a large population-based cohort of patients with diabetes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 1383 patients, commencing statins between 1990 and 2006, were identified from the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland database. Statin response was determined both by the minimum LDLc achieved, and by the failure of the patients to reach a clinical target LDLc (< or =2 mmol/l). APOE genotype and potential confounding covariates were entered into the linear and logistic regression models.
RESULTS: We found an association of APOE genotypes with both baseline and treatment responses. E2 homozygotes achieved lower LDLc levels (mean 0.6; confidence interval: 0.1-1.1 mmol/l) than E4 homozygotes (mean 1.7; confidence interval: 1.4-1.9 mmol/l; P=2.96 x 10). Minimum LDLc was associated by a linear trend with genotype. This relationship remained statistically significant after adjustment for baseline LDLc, adherence, duration, dose, smoking, and age. None of the E2 homozygotes failed to reach the target LDLc, compared with 32% of the E4 homozygotes (P=5.3 x 10).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential clinical value of the APOE genotype as a robust marker for LDLc responses to statin drugs, which might contribute to the identification of a particularly drug-resistant subgroup of patients. This marker provides information over and above baseline lipid levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18334912     DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f60aad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  21 in total

1.  Use of NBD-cholesterol to identify a minor but NPC1L1-independent cholesterol absorption pathway in mouse intestine.

Authors:  Michelle R Adams; Eddy Konaniah; James G Cash; David Y Hui
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Dan M Roden
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Accuracy of imputation to infer unobserved APOE epsilon alleles in genome-wide genotyping data.

Authors:  Farid Radmanesh; William J Devan; Christopher D Anderson; Jonathan Rosand; Guido J Falcone
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Common nonsynonymous substitutions in SLCO1B1 predispose to statin intolerance in routinely treated individuals with type 2 diabetes: a go-DARTS study.

Authors:  L A Donnelly; A S F Doney; R Tavendale; C C Lang; E R Pearson; H M Colhoun; M I McCarthy; A T Hattersley; A D Morris; C N A Palmer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Robust association of the LPA locus with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering response to statin treatment in a meta-analysis of 30 467 individuals from both randomized control trials and observational studies and association with coronary artery disease outcome during statin treatment.

Authors:  Louise A Donnelly; Natalie R van Zuydam; Kaixin Zhou; Roger Tavendale; Fiona Carr; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Maarten Leusink; Anthonius de Boer; Pieter A Doevendans; Folkert W Asselbergs; Andrew D Morris; Ewan R Pearson; Olaf H Klungel; Alex S F Doney; Colin N A Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Rare Coding Variation and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Farid Radmanesh; Guido J Falcone; Christopher D Anderson; David McWilliams; William J Devan; W Mark Brown; Thomas W K Battey; Alison M Ayres; Miriam R Raffeld; Kristin Schwab; Guangyun Sun; Ranjan Deka; Anand Viswanathan; Joshua N Goldstein; Steven M Greenberg; David L Tirschwell; Scott L Silliman; Magdy Selim; James F Meschia; Devin L Brown; Bradford B Worrall; Carl D Langefeld; Daniel Woo; Jonathan Rosand
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Clinical implications of pharmacogenetic variation on the effects of statins.

Authors:  Simran D S Maggo; Martin A Kennedy; David W J Clark
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Physiogenomic analysis of statin-treated patients: domain-specific counter effects within the ACACB gene on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol?

Authors:  Gualberto Ruaño; Paul D Thompson; John P Kane; Clive R Pullinger; Andreas Windemuth; Richard L Seip; Mohan Kocherla; Theodore R Holford; Alan H B Wu
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 9.  Laboratory Medicine in the Clinical Decision Support for Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia: Pharmacogenetics of Statins.

Authors:  Gualberto Ruaño; Richard Seip; Andreas Windemuth; Alan H B Wu; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.935

10.  Impact of common genetic variation on response to simvastatin therapy among 18 705 participants in the Heart Protection Study.

Authors:  Jemma C Hopewell; Sarah Parish; Alison Offer; Emma Link; Robert Clarke; Mark Lathrop; Jane Armitage; Rory Collins
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.