Literature DB >> 27579509

Evaluating Mailed Motivational, Individually Tailored Postcard Boosters for Promoting Girls' Postintervention Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity.

Marion Bakhoya1, Jiying Ling, Karin A Pfeiffer, Lorraine B Robbins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ways to optimize boosters to assist girls to attain adequate moderate-to-vigorous physical activity following an intervention are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study's purpose was to (a) determine whether girls receiving mailed motivational, individually tailored postcard boosters following a 17-week physical activity intervention would have greater moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at 9-month follow-up as compared to girls not receiving them and those in a control group and (b) evaluate girls' perceptions of the booster intervention.
METHODS: Sixth to seventh grade girls (n = 117) from two urban, Midwest schools with similar demographic characteristics participated in a 17-week physical activity intervention, and girls from a third school served as controls (n = 64). One (n = 54) of the two intervention schools was randomly assigned to receive 13 motivational, individually tailored postcards containing messages to encourage them to attain adequate physical activity during the postintervention period. Girls from the other intervention school (n = 63) did not receive postcards, and those in the control school did not receive any intervention. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was measured with accelerometers at postintervention and 9-month follow-up. Girls completed a postcard evaluation survey at 9-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity decreased significantly from postintervention to 9-month follow-up with no between-group differences or group-by-time interaction effect. On the basis of the survey, 27 (64.3%) girls received all postcards. Only 15 (35.7%) read all that they had received. Evaluations of postcards tended to be favorable. DISCUSSION: Mailed booster postcards to promote physical activity among girls' postintervention were not effective. Strategies to achieve this objective warrant investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27579509      PMCID: PMC5010026          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  20 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention.

Authors:  M Dijkstra; I Mesters; H De Vries; G van Breukelen; G S Parcel
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1999-12

2.  Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity.

Authors:  Carl B Frederick; Kaisa Snellman; Robert D Putnam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The nutrition and enjoyable activity for teen girls study: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah L Dewar; Philip J Morgan; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Anthony D Okely; Clare E Collins; Marijka Batterham; Robin Callister; David R Lubans
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Maria Hagströmer; David M Pober; Heather R Bowles
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Twelve-month physical activity outcomes in Latinas in the Seamos Saludables trial.

Authors:  Bess H Marcus; Shira I Dunsiger; Dori Pekmezi; Britta A Larsen; Becky Marquez; Beth C Bock; Kim M Gans; Kathleen M Morrow; Peter Tilkemeier
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Patients' experience of a telephone booster intervention to support weight management in Type 2 diabetes and its acceptability.

Authors:  Lihua Wu; Angus Forbes; Alison While
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.184

7.  Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura P Svetkey; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jack F Hollis; Catherine M Loria; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Kristine Funk; Patti Smith; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Valerie Myers; Lillian F Lien; Daniel Laferriere; Betty Kennedy; Gerald J Jerome; Fran Heinith; David W Harsha; Pamela Evans; Thomas P Erlinger; Arline T Dalcin; Janelle Coughlin; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Champagne; Alan Bauck; Jamy D Ard; Kathleen Aicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 2013.

Authors:  Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Kawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Eboni Taylor; Zewditu Demissie; Nancy Brener; Jemekia Thornton; John Moore; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2014-06-13

9.  Parenting and the decline of physical activity from age 9 to 15.

Authors:  R H Bradley; S McRitchie; R M Houts; P Nader; M O'Brien
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  "Girls on the Move" intervention protocol for increasing physical activity among low-active underserved urban girls: a group randomized trial.

Authors:  Lorraine B Robbins; Karin A Pfeiffer; Amber Vermeesch; Kenneth Resnicow; Zhiying You; Lawrence An; Stacey M Wesolek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  A sex/gender perspective on interventions to promote children's and adolescents' overall physical activity: results from genEffects systematic review.

Authors:  Carolin Schulze; Yolanda Demetriou; Sandra Emmerling; Annegret Schlund; Susan P Phillips; Lorri Puil; Stephanie E Coen; Anne K Reimers
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.125

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.