Glorisa Canino1, Margarita Alegría. 1. University of Puerto Rico Medical School, Medical Sciences Campus, Behavioral Research Institute, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067, USA. gcanino@rcm.upr.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is little consensus on the extent to which psychiatric disorders or syndromes are universal or the extent to which they differ on their core definitions and constellation of symptoms as a result of cultural or contextual factors. This controversy continues due to the lack of biological markers, imprecise measurement and the lack of a gold standard for validating most psychiatric conditions. METHOD: Empirical studies were used to present evidence in favor of or against a universalist or relativistic view of child psychiatric disorders using a model developed by Robins and Guze to determine the validity of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: The prevalence of some of the most common specific disorders and syndromes as well as its risk and protective factors vary across cultures, yet comorbid patterns and response to treatments vary little across cultures. Cross-cultural longitudinal data on outcomes is equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cultural validity of child disorders may vary drastically depending on the disorder, but empirical evidence that attests for the cross-cultural validity of diagnostic criteria for each child disorder is lacking. There is a need for studies that investigate the extent to which gene-environment interactions are related to specific disorders across cultures. Clinicians are urged to consider culture and context in determining the way in which children's psychopathology may be manifested independent of their views. Recommendations for the upcoming classificatory system are provided so that practical or theoretical considerations are addressed about how culture and ethnic issues affect the assessment or treatment of specific disorders in children.
BACKGROUND: There is little consensus on the extent to which psychiatric disorders or syndromes are universal or the extent to which they differ on their core definitions and constellation of symptoms as a result of cultural or contextual factors. This controversy continues due to the lack of biological markers, imprecise measurement and the lack of a gold standard for validating most psychiatric conditions. METHOD: Empirical studies were used to present evidence in favor of or against a universalist or relativistic view of childpsychiatric disorders using a model developed by Robins and Guze to determine the validity of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: The prevalence of some of the most common specific disorders and syndromes as well as its risk and protective factors vary across cultures, yet comorbid patterns and response to treatments vary little across cultures. Cross-cultural longitudinal data on outcomes is equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cultural validity of child disorders may vary drastically depending on the disorder, but empirical evidence that attests for the cross-cultural validity of diagnostic criteria for each child disorder is lacking. There is a need for studies that investigate the extent to which gene-environment interactions are related to specific disorders across cultures. Clinicians are urged to consider culture and context in determining the way in which children's psychopathology may be manifested independent of their views. Recommendations for the upcoming classificatory system are provided so that practical or theoretical considerations are addressed about how culture and ethnic issues affect the assessment or treatment of specific disorders in children.
Authors: Hector R Bird; Patrick E Shrout; Mark Davies; Glorisa Canino; Cristiane S Duarte; S A Shen; Rolf Loeber Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Susan Caplan; Jennifer Alvidrez; Manuel Paris; Javier I Escobar; Jane K Dixon; Mayur M Desai; Robin Whittemore; Lawrence D Scahill Journal: Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010
Authors: Masha Y Ivanova; Thomas M Achenbach; Leslie A Rescorla; Valerie S Harder; Rebecca P Ang; Niels Bilenberg; Gudrun Bjarnadottir; Christiane Capron; Sarah S W De Pauw; Pedro Dias; Anca Dobrean; Manfred Doepfner; Michele Duyme; Valsamma Eapen; Nese Erol; Elaheh Mohammad Esmaeili; Lourdes Ezpeleta; Alessandra Frigerio; Miguel M Gonçalves; Halldor S Gudmundsson; Suh-Fang Jeng; Pranvera Jetishi; Roma Jusiene; Young-Ah Kim; Solvejg Kristensen; Felipe Lecannelier; Patrick W L Leung; Jianghong Liu; Rosario Montirosso; Kyung Ja Oh; Julia Plueck; Rolando Pomalima; Mimoza Shahini; Jaime R Silva; Zynep Simsek; Andre Sourander; Jose Valverde; Karla G Van Leeuwen; Bernardine S C Woo; Yen-Tzu Wu; Stephen R Zubrick; Frank C Verhulst Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Matthew D Burkey; Lajina Ghimire; Ramesh P Adhikari; Brandon A Kohrt; Mark J D Jordans; Emily Haroz; Lawrence Wissow Journal: Int J Cult Ment Health Date: 2016-09-14