OBJECTIVE: Identification and treatment of depression may be difficult for primary care providers when there is a mismatch between the patient's subjective experiences of illness and objective criteria. Cultural differences in presentation of symptoms among Latino immigrants may hinder access to care for treatment of depression. This article seeks to describe the self-perceptions and symptoms of Latino primary care patients who identify themselves as depressed but do not meet screening criteria for depression. METHOD: A convenience sample of Latino immigrants (N = 177) in Corona, Queens, New York, was obtained from a primary care practice from August 2008 to December 2008. The sample was divided into 3 groups according to whether participants met Patient Health Questionnaire diagnostic criteria for depression and whether or not participants had a self-perceived mental health problem and self-identified their problem as "depression" from a checklist of cultural idioms of distress. Psychosocial, demographic, and treatment variables were compared between the 3 groups. RESULTS: Participants' descriptions of symptoms had a predominantly somatic component. The most common complaints were ánimo bajo (low energy) and decaimiento (weakness). Participants with "subjective" depression had mean scores of somatic symptoms and depression severity that were significantly lower than the participants with "objective" depression and significantly higher than the group with no depression (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Latino immigrants who perceive that they need help with depression, but do not meet screening criteria for depression, still have significant distress and impairment. To avoid having these patients "fall through the cracks," it is important to take into account culturally accepted expressions of distress and the meaning of illness for the individual.
OBJECTIVE: Identification and treatment of depression may be difficult for primary care providers when there is a mismatch between the patient's subjective experiences of illness and objective criteria. Cultural differences in presentation of symptoms among Latino immigrants may hinder access to care for treatment of depression. This article seeks to describe the self-perceptions and symptoms of Latino primary care patients who identify themselves as depressed but do not meet screening criteria for depression. METHOD: A convenience sample of Latino immigrants (N = 177) in Corona, Queens, New York, was obtained from a primary care practice from August 2008 to December 2008. The sample was divided into 3 groups according to whether participants met Patient Health Questionnaire diagnostic criteria for depression and whether or not participants had a self-perceived mental health problem and self-identified their problem as "depression" from a checklist of cultural idioms of distress. Psychosocial, demographic, and treatment variables were compared between the 3 groups. RESULTS:Participants' descriptions of symptoms had a predominantly somatic component. The most common complaints were ánimo bajo (low energy) and decaimiento (weakness). Participants with "subjective" depression had mean scores of somatic symptoms and depression severity that were significantly lower than the participants with "objective" depression and significantly higher than the group with no depression (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Latino immigrants who perceive that they need help with depression, but do not meet screening criteria for depression, still have significant distress and impairment. To avoid having these patients "fall through the cracks," it is important to take into account culturally accepted expressions of distress and the meaning of illness for the individual.
Authors: Alejandro Interian; Lesley A Allen; Michael A Gara; Javier I Escobar; Angélica M Díaz-Martínez Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Linda H Chaudron; Harriet J Kitzman; Karen L Peifer; Scott Morrow; Linda M Perez; Mary C Newman Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: David P Eisenman; Lisa S Meredith; Hilary Rhodes; Bonnie L Green; Stacey Kaltman; Andrea Cassells; Jonathan N Tobin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-06-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: L L Judd; H S Akiskal; J D Maser; P J Zeller; J Endicott; W Coryell; M P Paulus; J L Kunovac; A C Leon; T I Mueller; J A Rice; M B Keller Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Priscilla M Flynn; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Mark L Wieland; Mark D Williams; Lindsey R Haas; Walter K Kremers; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brandon A Kohrt; Andrew Rasmussen; Bonnie N Kaiser; Emily E Haroz; Sujen M Maharjan; Byamah B Mutamba; Joop T V M de Jong; Devon E Hinton Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Jordi Alonso; Matthias Angermeyer; Evelyn Bromet; Giovanni de Girolamo; Peter de Jonge; Koen Demyttenaere; Silvia E Florescu; Michael J Gruber; Oye Gureje; Chiyi Hu; Yueqin Huang; Elie G Karam; Robert Jin; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Daphna Levinson; Katie A McLaughlin; María E Medina-Mora; Siobhan O'Neill; Yutaka Ono; José A Posada-Villa; Nancy A Sampson; Kate M Scott; Victoria Shahly; Dan J Stein; Maria C Viana; Zahari Zarkov; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 6.505