Literature DB >> 18333014

Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print?

P W Plaisier1, M M Pauwels, J F Lange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1995 the concept of a 'critical view of safety' (CVS) in Calot's triangle was introduced to prevent bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to determine the most reliable method for recording CVS.
METHODS: Operation notes, video images and photo prints from 50 consecutive elective non-converted laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analysed.
RESULTS: Operation notes alone did not suffice to record CVS. As an adjunct, video proved superior to photo print with regard to quality. Nevertheless, photo prints were practically and logistically much easier to produce than video. Moreover, when good quality images were achieved, photo print recorded CVS more conclusively than video. DISCUSSION: Operation notes,video and photo print are complementary, and the combination records CVS conclusively in nearly every case.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 18333014      PMCID: PMC2020624          DOI: 10.1080/136518201753242208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.

Authors:  A R Moossa; D W Easter; E Van Sonnenberg; G Casola; H D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  New retraction technique to allow better visualization of Calot's triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Sekimoto; N Tomita; S Tamura; H Ohsato; M Monden
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen; R Vecchio; A E Ricardo; C R Mathis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences.

Authors:  K A Kern
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-04

Review 5.  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M Hertl; N J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Surgical management of iatrogenic bile duct injury.

Authors:  L T De Wit; E A Rauws; D J Gouma
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1999

7.  How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs. A comparison between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E M Targarona; C Marco; C Balagué; J Rodriguez; E Cugat; C Hoyuela; E Veloso; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention, and management.

Authors:  H J Asbun; R L Rossi; J A Lowell; J L Munson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Are we getting the critical view? A prospective study of photographic documentation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tracey Lam; Val Usatoff; Steven T F Chan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Registering the critical view of safety: photo or video?

Authors:  M Emous; M Westerterp; J Wind; J P Eerenberg; A A W van Geloven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Association of Video Completed by Audio in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Improvements in Operative Reporting.

Authors:  Özgür Eryigit; Floyd W van de Graaf; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Meindert N Sosef; Eelco J R de Graaf; Anand G Menon; Marilyne M Lange; Johan F Lange
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 4.  Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions.

Authors:  K Tim Buddingh; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Lianne van Buuren; Jan B F Hulscher; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K T Buddingh; A N Morks; H O ten Cate Hoedemaker; C B Blaauw; G M van Dam; R J Ploeg; H S Hofker; V B Nieuwenhuijs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of protocol uniformity concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Linda S G L Wauben; Richard H M Goossens; Daan J van Eijk; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey.

Authors:  Floyd W van de Graaf; Özgür Eryigit; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.