Literature DB >> 18331928

Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.

Omür Polat-Ozsoy1, Beyza Hancioğlu Kircelli, Ayça Arman-Ozçirpici, Z Ozgür Pektaş, Sina Uçkan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects obtained with 2 types of pendulum appliance with different anchorage designs: bone-anchored pendulum appliance (BAPA) and conventional pendulum appliance (CPA).
METHODS: The sample consisted of 39 patients (25 girls, 14 boys) with Angle Class II molar relationships. Correction of the molar relationship was achieved with the BAPA with palatal intermaxillary fixation screws for anchorage in the first group (n = 22) and with the CPA in the second group (n = 17). Lateral cephalograms before treatment and at the end of distalization were measured, and changes in the groups and the differences between the groups were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The average distalization times were 6.8 months for the BAPA group and 5.1 months for the CPA group. The maxillary first molars were tipped 9.1 degrees in the BAPA group and 5.3 degrees in the CPA group; the molars moved distally 4.8 mm in the BAPA group and 2.7 mm in the CPA group. Despite mesialization of the premolars and proclination of the incisors with the CPA, both premolars were spontaneously distalized, and the incisors were retruded with the BAPA.
CONCLUSIONS: The amount of distal molar movement was similar between the BAPA and the CPA. No anchorage loss or spontaneous distal premolar and incisor movement, which might decrease total treatment time, was seen with the BAPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18331928     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  Maxillary molar distalization with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roshan Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha; Yousef Al-Thomali
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Erdal Bozkaya; Tuba Tortop; Sema Yüksel; Emine Kaygısız
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; S Yamaguchi; B Ludwig; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.

Authors:  Mümin Kırcalı; Alime Sema Yüksel
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-01

5.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Ali Alper Pampu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Mattia Fontana; Elena Longoni; Mauro Cozzani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.

Authors:  Cagla Sar; Burcak Kaya; Omur Ozsoy; Ayca Arman Özcirpici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Class II correction by maxillary en masse distalization using a completely customized lingual appliance and a novel mini-screw anchorage concept - preliminary results.

Authors:  Frauke Beyling; Elisabeth Klang; Eva Niehoff; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  The use of intraosseous screw for upper molar distalization: a case report.

Authors:  Omür Polat-Ozsoy
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-04

10.  Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Alessandra Cafagna; Mattia Fontana; Mauro Cozzani
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.