Literature DB >> 18330627

Sphincter-preserving operations following preoperative chemoradiation: an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer?

Jung Wook Huh1, Eun Joo Jung, Yoon Ah Park, Kang Young Lee, Seung-Kook Sohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sphincter-preserving operations (SPO) for lower rectal cancer are on the rise. In the study reported here, we compared the oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent sphincter-preserving operations following preoperative chemoradiation for lower rectal cancer with the outcome for patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR).
METHODS: This prospective study included 87 patients who underwent proctectomy with curative intent for locally advanced rectal cancer that was located less than 6 cm from the anal verge. Forty-four patients had APR with no preoperative treatment. Forty-three patients underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) consisting of preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and pelvic radiation (4500-5040 cGy); this was followed 6 weeks later by surgery (SPO/CCRT). The oncologic outcomes between the two groups were compared, and factors affecting survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 56.2 months. The overall postoperative complication rates did not significantly differ between SPO/CCRT and APR (32.6% versus 34.2%; p = 0.879). Also, there were no significant differences in the overall recurrence rate (20.9% versus 20.5%; p = 0.956) and 5-year overall survival rate (70.8% versus 62.9%; p = 0.189) between the two groups. By multivariate analysis, only the pathologic N stage was significantly associated with overall survival (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter-preserving operation with CCRT could be another option for the treatment of locally advanced lower rectal cancer in patients who are clinically considered for APR, with no deterioration of oncologic outcomes. For patients undergoing curative resection for lower rectal cancer, the pathologic N stage can provide valuable prognostic information about survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18330627     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9520-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  25 in total

1.  Experience of surgery for rectal cancer with total mesorectal excision in a general surgical practice.

Authors:  J F Dowdall; D Maguire; O J McAnena
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum.

Authors:  E Rullier; B Goffre; C Bonnel; F Zerbib; M Caudry; J Saric
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  N A Janjan; V S Khoo; J Abbruzzese; R Pazdur; R Dubrow; K R Cleary; P K Allen; P M Lynch; G Glober; R Wolff; T A Rich; J Skibber
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jose G Guillem; David B Chessin; Alfred M Cohen; Jinru Shia; Madhu Mazumdar; Warren Enker; Philip B Paty; Martin R Weiser; David Klimstra; Leonard Saltz; Bruce D Minsky; W Douglas Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision with double-stapling anastomosis for rectal cancers: analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Kin Wah Chu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A prospective study of local recurrence after resection and low stapled anastomosis in 183 patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Rubbini; G F Vettorello; C Guerrera; C Mari; D De Anna; F Mascoli; E Pozza; V Gasbarro; I Donini
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome.

Authors:  W L Law; K W Chu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Yoon Ah Park; Seung Kook Sohn
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Options for sphincter preservation in surgery for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  M G Tytherleigh; N J McC Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  12 in total

1.  Lymphovascular or perineural invasion may predict lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 and T2 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Intraoperative staging by surgeons in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation: diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Woo Yong Lee; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Carsta Koehler; Juliane Stelzer; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Sun; Xianbo Yu; Haijiang Wang; Ming Ma; Zeliang Zhao; Qisan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Impact of Length of Distal Margin on Outcomes Following Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Middle and Lower Third Rectal Cancers.

Authors:  Rahul Bhamre; Abhishek Mitra; Anup Tamankar; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-09

6.  Effects of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Sang Woo Lim; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Krzysztof Bujko; Andrzej Rutkowski; George J Chang; Wojciech Michalski; Ewa Chmielik; Jerzy Kusnierz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer with close distal resection margins: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kyung Sook Hong; Nara Moon; Soon Sup Chung; Ryung-Ah Lee; Kwang Ho Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in an unselected population: quality assessment in a low volume center.

Authors:  Floris T J Ferenschild; Imro Dawson; Johannes H W de Wilt; Eelco J R de Graaf; Richard P R Groenendijk; Geert W M Tetteroo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Mismatch Repair Gene Expression as a Predictor of Tumor Responses in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Hee Cheol Kim; Seok Hyung Kim; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Hee Chul Park; Doo Ho Choi; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.