Literature DB >> 18330626

Bedside placement of removable vena cava filters guided by intravascular ultrasound in the critically injured.

Konstantinos Spaniolas1, George C Velmahos, Christopher Kwolek, Alice Gervasini, Marc De Moya, Hasan B Alam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bedside placement of removable inferior vena cava filters (RVCF) is increasingly used in critically injured patients. The need for fluoroscopic equipment and specialized intensive care unit beds presents major challenges. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) eliminates such problems. The objective of the present study was to analyze the safety and feasibility of IVUS-guided bedside RVCF placement in critically injured patients.
METHODS: Between October 2004 and July 2006 47 IVUS-guided RVCF were placed at the bedside. Medical and trauma registry records were reviewed. Primary outcome was RVCF-related complications.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 41 +/- 19 years, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 30 +/- 12. The right common femoral vein was chosen as the site of access in 40 patients, and the left common femoral vein was the access site in 7 patients. The insertion was performed 3.7 +/- 2.5 days after admission. Four patients (8.5%) developed common femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and three (6%) developed a peripheral pulmonary embolism (PE). Complications related to technique were recorded in two patients (4%) and included one misplacement and one access site bleeding with no further associated morbidity. Five patients died during the hospital stay from issues unrelated to RVCF. Forty-one patients were eligible for follow-up. Removal of RVCF was offered only to 8 patients and was performed successfully in 4 (10%) at a mean of 130 days (range: 44-183 days).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study IVUS-guided bedside placement of RVCF was feasible but was also associated with complications. Follow-up was poor, and the rate of removal disappointingly low, underscoring the need for further exploration of the role of RVCF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18330626     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9523-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  48 in total

1.  Retrievable vena cava filters for preventing pulmonary embolism in trauma patients: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Jared L Antevil; Michael J Sise; Daniel I Sack; Kevin J Sasadeusz; Sophia M Swanson; Louis Rivera; Barbara R Lome; Karl E Weingarten; Stephen S Kaminski
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-01

2.  Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: initial clinical results.

Authors:  David Rosenthal; Eric D Wellons; Kin Man Lai; Andras Bikk; Vernon J Henderson
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  Preliminary results of bedside inferior vena cava filter placement: safe and cost-effective.

Authors:  R F Sing; C H Smith; W S Miles; W J Messick
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Is contrast as bad as we think? Renal function after angiographic embolization of injured patients.

Authors:  Pantelis Vassiliu; Jack Sava; Konstantinos G Toutouzas; George C Velmahos
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Prophylactic vena cava filter insertion in severely injured trauma patients: indications and preliminary results.

Authors:  F B Rogers; S R Shackford; J Wilson; M A Ricci; C S Morris
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-10

6.  Long-duration temporary vena cava filter: a prospective 104-case multicenter study.

Authors:  Gilles Bovyn; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Philippe Reynaud; Alain-Ferdinand Le Blanche
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  J C Tola; R Holtzman; L Lottenberg
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma.

Authors:  W H Geerts; K I Code; R M Jay; E Chen; J P Szalai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Placement of vena cava filters: factors affecting technical success and immediate complications.

Authors:  Michael A Savin; Harish K Panicker; Shahzad Sadiq; Yahya A Albeer; Ronald E Olson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Intravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement.

Authors:  W F Oppat; A C Chiou; J S Matsumura
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1999-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.