| Literature DB >> 18330519 |
Masanori Tsutsumi1, Hiroshi Aikawa, Masanari Onizuka, Tomonobu Kodama, Kouhei Nii, Shuko Matsubara, Minoru Iko, Housei Etou, Kimiya Sakamoto, Kiyoshi Kazekawa.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Because of its high complication rate, the endovascular treatment (EVT) of anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms less than 3 mm in maximum diameter remains controversial. We evaluated EVT of tiny ruptured ACoA aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18330519 PMCID: PMC2440929 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-008-0371-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroradiology ISSN: 0028-3940 Impact factor: 2.804
Fig. 1Patient 4. a Angiogram of the left ICA shows a tiny ACoA aneurysm with a maximum diameter of 2.5 mm (arrow). b Photograph of a steam-shaped microcatheter. The shaping mandrel is bent to conform to the shape of the horizontal portion of the anterior cerebral artery. c Unsubtracted image of the skull obtained with the road-mapping technique during treatment. Embolization was with a GDC-10 Soft coil measuring 2×60 mm. d Angiogram of the left ICA obtained at the end of the procedure shows complete occlusion of the aneurysm. The diameter of the coil mass was larger than that of the aneurysm sac before embolization, indicating aneurysm distention
Summary of 19 tiny ruptured ACoA aneurysm treated with endovascular treatment
| Patient | Aneurysm | Coils (no. × mm)a | Angiographic occlusion | Complication | Follow-up | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Age (years) | Sex | Hunt & Hess grade | Size (mm) | Dome/neck ratio | Angiographic | Clinical | |||||
| Period (months) | Recanalization | Period (months) | Outcome (mRS score) | |||||||||
| 1 | 56 | M | 2 | 3×3×2.5 | 1.3 | 3×40, 2×30 | Complete | None | 72 | − | 84 | 0 |
| 2 | 58 | F | 2 | 3×3×3 | 1.2 | 3×60, 2×20 | Near-complete | None | 64 | + | 80 | 0 |
| 3 | 51 | M | 1 | 3×2.5×2.5 | 1.4 | 2×60, 2×30, 2×20 | Complete | None | 60 | − | 60 | 0 |
| 4 | 89 | F | 3 | 2.5×2×2 | 1.5 | 2×60 | Complete | None | NA | − | 36 | 4 |
| 5 | 82 | F | 2 | 2.5×2.5×2 | 1.7 | 2×60 | Complete | None | 48 | + | 75 | 2 |
| 6 | 50 | M | 4 | 3×3×3 | 1.1 | 3×40, 2×40, 2×20 | Complete | None | 52 | − | 70 | 1 |
| 7 | 44 | F | 1 | 3×2.5×3 | 1.6 | 3×60, 2×40 | Complete | None | 48 | − | 64 | 0 |
| 8 | 58 | F | 3 | 3×3×3 | 1.8 | 3×60, 2×40, 2×10 | Complete | None | 40 | − | 40 | 2 |
| 9 | 66 | M | 3 | 3×2.5×2.5 | 1.9 | 2.5×60, 2×30, 2×10 | Near-complete | None | 36 | − | 58 | 1 |
| 10 | 79 | F | 2 | 2.5×2×2 | 1.1 | 2×60 | Complete | None | 48 | − | 48 | 1 |
| 11 | 78 | M | 1 | 3×2.5×2.5 | 1.5 | 3×60, 2×60 | Complete | None | 36 | − | 39 | 0 |
| 12 | 53 | M | 2 | 2.5×2.5×2 | 1.2 | 2.5×60, 2×30 | Complete | None | 37 | − | 37 | 0 |
| 13 | 84 | F | 3 | 3×2.5×2.5 | 1.8 | 3×60, 2×20, 2×10 | Complete | None | NA | − | 24 | 5 |
| 14 | 53 | M | 1 | 3×2×2 | 2.1 | 2×60, 2×40 | Complete | None | 36 | − | 36 | 0 |
| 15 | 52 | F | 3 | 2×2×2 | 1.4 | 2×40, 2×30 | Complete | None | 27 | − | 30 | 0 |
| 16 | 66 | M | 3 | 3×2.5×2.5 | 2.0 | 3×40, 2×20, 2×10 | Complete | None | 25 | − | 30 | 1 |
| 17 | 83 | F | 4 | 3×3×3 | 1.7 | 3×40, 2×40 | Complete | None | 24 | − | 27 | 3 |
| 18 | 47 | F | 4 | 3×2.5×3 | 1.9 | 3×80 | Complete | None | NA | − | NA | 6 |
| 19 | 90 | F | 2 | 2.5×2×2 | 1.7 | 2×40, 2×20 | Near-complete | None | 16 | − | 17 | 2 |
NA not avairable
aAll coils used were GDC-10 Soft or GDC-10 Ultrasoft.
Fig. 2Patient 5. a Angiogram of the left ICA shows a tiny ACoA aneurysm with a maximum diameter of 2.5 mm. b Unsubtracted image of the skull obtained with the road-mapping technique during treatment. Embolization was with a GDC-10 Soft coil measuring 2×60 mm. c Angiogram of the left ICA obtained at the end of the procedure shows complete occlusion of the aneurysm. d Angiogram of the left ICA obtained at the 3-month follow-up shows minor recanalization of the neck (arrow). e The minor neck filling was stable at the 48-month follow-up
Fig. 3Patient 8. a Angiogram of the left ICA shows a tiny ACoA aneurysm with blebs. b Angiogram of the left ICA obtained at the end of the procedure. The aneurysm sac and blebs are completely occluded with coils. The coil mass is larger than the aneurysm sac before embolization (indicating aneurysm distention)