Literature DB >> 12854737

Treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: complementary aspects of microsurgical and endovascular procedures.

François Proust1, Bertrand Debono, Didier Hannequin, Emmanuel Gerardin, Erick Clavier, Olivier Langlois, Pierre Fréger.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Endovascular and surgical treatment must be clearly defined in the management of anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms. In this study the authors report their recent experience in using a combined surgical and endovascular team approach for ACoA aneurysms, and compare these results with those obtained during an earlier period in which surgical treatment was used alone. Morbidity and mortality rates, causes of unfavorable outcomes, and morphological results were also assessed.
METHODS: The prospective study included 223 patients who were divided into three groups: Group A (83 microsurgically treated patients, 1990-1995); Group B (103 microsurgically treated patients, 1996-2000); and Group C (37 patients treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coil [GDC] embolization, 1996-2000). Depending on the direction in which the aneurysm fundus projected, the authors attempted to apply microsurgical treatment to Type 1 aneurysms (located in front of the axis formed by the pericallosal arteries). They proposed the most adapted procedure for Type 2 aneurysms (located behind the axis of the pericallosal arteries) after discussion with the neurovascular team, depending on the physiological status of the patient, the treatment risk, and the size of the aneurysm neck. In accordance with the classification of Hunt and Hess, the authors designated those patients with unruptured aneurysms (Grade 0) and some patients with ruptured aneurysms (Grades I-III) as having good preoperative grades. Patients with Grade IV or V hemorrhages were designated as having poor preoperative grades. By performing routine angiography and computerized tomography scanning, the causes of unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score < 5) and the morphological results (complete or incomplete occlusion) were analyzed. Overall, the clinical outcome was excellent (GOS Score 5) in 65% of patients, good (GOS Score 4) in 9.4%, fair (GOS Score 3) in 11.6%, poor (GOS Score 2) in 3.6%, and fatal in 10.3% (GOS Score 1). Among 166 patients in good preoperative grades, an excellent outcome was observed in 134 patients (80.7%). The combined permanent morbidity and mortality rate accounted for up to 19.3% of patients. The rates of permanent morbidity and death that were related to the initial subarachnoid hemorrhage were 6.2 and 1.5% for Group A, 6.6 and 1.3% for Group B, and 4 and 4% for Group C, respectively. The rates of permanent morbidity and death that were related to the procedure were 15.4 and 1.5% for Group A, 3.9 and 0% for Group B, and 8 and 8% for Group C, respectively. When microsurgical periods were compared, the rate of permanent morbidity or death related to microsurgical complications decreased significantly (Group A, 11 patients [16.9%] and Group B, three patients [3.9%]); Fisher exact test, p = 0.011) from the period of 1990 to 1995 to the period of 1996 to 2000. The combined rate of morbidity and mortality that was related to the endovascular procedure (16%) explained the nonsignificance of the different rates of procedural complications for the two periods, despite the significant decrease in the number of microsurgical complications. Among 57 patients in poor preoperative grade, an excellent outcome was observed in 11 patients (19.3%); however, permanent morbidity (GOS Scores 2-4) or death (GOS Score 1) occurred in 46 patients (80.7%). With regard to the correlation between vessel occlusion (the primary microsurgical complication) and the morphological characteristics of aneurysms, only the direction in which the fundus projected appeared significant as a risk factor for the microsurgically treated groups (Fisher exact test: Group A, p = 0.03; Group B, p = 0.002). The difference between endovascular and microsurgical procedures in the achievement of complete occlusion was considered significant (chi2 = 6.13, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The direction in which the fundus projects was chosen as the morphological criterion between endovascular and surgical methods. The authors propose that microsurgical clip application should be the preferred option in the treatment of ACoA aneurysms with anteriorly directed fundi and that endovascular packing be selected for those lesions with posteriorly directed fundi, depending on morphological criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12854737     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  19 in total

1.  Angiographic outcome after endovascular therapy for anterior communicating artery aneurysms: correlation with vascular morphological features.

Authors:  Akihiro Uemura; Minobu Kamo; Hidetoshi Matsukawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Treatment strategies for complex intracranial aneurysms: review of a 12-year experience at the university of cincinnati.

Authors:  Norberto Andaluz; Mario Zuccarello
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-07

3.  Influence of clinical and anatomic features on treatment decisions for anterior communicating artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Jae-Hyung Choi; Myung-Jin Kang; Jae-Taeck Huh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-08-31

4.  Value of Flat-detector Computed Tomography Angiography with Intravenous Contrast Media Injection in the Evaluation and Treatment of Acutely Ruptured Aneurysms of the AcomA complex: A Single Center Experience in 15 Cases.

Authors:  Julie Rösch; Stefan Lang; Philipp Gölitz; Bernd Kallmünzer; Karl Rössler; Arnd Doerfler; Tobias Struffert
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Endovascular treatment of ACom intracranial aneurysms. Report on series of 280 patients.

Authors:  S Finitsis; R Anxionnat; A Lebedinsky; P C Albuquerque; M F Clayton; L Picard; S Bracard
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Endovascular treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Results and technical considerations.

Authors:  Y Nakai; M Sonobe; N Kato; S Okamoto; K Nakamura; K Sugita
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 7.  Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Fang; W Brinjikji; M H Murad; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Clipping of the Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm without Sylvian Fissure Dissection.

Authors:  Ji Kwang Yun; Sung Don Kang; Jong Moon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-11-20

9.  Consecutive Endovascular Treatment of 20 Ruptured Very Small (<3 mm) Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.

Authors:  Kaiz S Asif; Ahsan Sattar; Marc A Lazzaro; Brian-Fred Fitzsimmons; John R Lynch; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-03-22

10.  Analysis of superiorly projecting anterior communicating artery aneurysms: anatomy, techniques, and outcome. A proposed classification system.

Authors:  Erez Nossek; Avi Setton; Reza Karimi; Amir R Dehdashti; David J Langer; David J Chalif
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.