Literature DB >> 18327143

Low redetachment rate due to encircling scleral buckle in giant retinal tears treated with vitrectomy and silicone oil.

Fleur Goezinne1, Ellen C LA Heij, Tos T J M Berendschot, Sacha T J M Gast, Albert T A Liem, Igor L Lundqvist, Fred Hendrikse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for redetachment and to assess long-term anatomic and functional results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for retinal detachment associated with giant retinal tears (GRT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study the authors analyzed 30 eyes which were operated with PPV for GRT retinal detachment in their clinic between March 1998 and August 2003.
RESULTS: Redetachment rate after one vitrectomy procedure in this series of 30 eyes was 30% (n = 9), and ultimately, the retina was attached in 29 (96.7%) eyes. After multivariate analysis the absence of an encircling scleral buckle (P = 0.008) was significantly associated with redetachment. Visual acuity improved in 54% of the eyes.
CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy with an encircling scleral buckle seems to be a preferred treatment for complicated retinal detachments due to GRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327143     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318150d879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  13 in total

1.  Outcome of surgery in patients with giant retinal tear: 10 years experience.

Authors:  K Ghasemi Falavarjani; S A Alemzadeh; M Modarres; S A Alemzadeh; M M Parvarash; M Naseripour; M Hashemi; M Robatmeili
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Silicone oil versus gas tamponade for giant retinal tear-associated fovea-sparing retinal detachment: a comparison of outcome.

Authors:  P J Banerjee; A Chandra; P Petrou; D G Charteris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with medium-term postoperative perfluoro-n-octane for the repair of giant retinal tears.

Authors:  John C Randolph; Rocio I Diaz; Eric J Sigler; Jorge I Calzada; Steve Charles
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Contemporary Management of Complex and Non-Complex Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Due to Giant Retinal Tears.

Authors:  Katie X Li; Nicholas Carducci; Omar Moinuddin; Yunshu Zhou; David C Musch; David N Zacks; Cagri G Besirli; Thomas J Wubben
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-08

5.  Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear.

Authors:  Mario Gutierrez; Jose L Rodriguez; Diego Zamora-de La Cruz; Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Linda C Novak; Rene Cano Hidalgo; Federico Graue
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-16

6.  Outcomes in bullous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Sarah P Read; Ryan C Young; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-12

7.  Giant retinal tears after prior pars plana vitrectomy: management strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Marco A Gonzalez; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Thomas A Albini; Audina M Berrocal; Paul Tenzel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-27

8.  The outcome of surgical management for giant retinal tear more than 180°.

Authors:  Sherif A Dabour
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 9.  Major challenges in vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  Yijun Hu; Shibo Tang
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 10.  Management of recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Manish Nagpal; Pranita Chaudhary; Shachi Wachasundar; Ahmed Eltayib; Aparajita Raihan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.