Literature DB >> 18326872

Buccal swabs and treated cards: methodological considerations for molecular epidemiologic studies examining pediatric populations.

Sara M Beckett1, Stephen J Laughton, Luciano Dalla Pozza, Geoffrey B McCowage, Glenn Marshall, Richard J Cohn, Elizabeth Milne, Lesley J Ashton.   

Abstract

Self-collection of buccal cells provides a noninvasive method for obtaining biologic samples for genetic analyses in pediatric studies. Nevertheless, low yields, microbial contamination, and degradation of buccal samples present challenges for epidemiologic studies incorporating genetic investigations. The aims of this study were to compare the quality and yield of DNA extracted from buccal specimens with BuccalAmp swabs (Epicenter BioTechnologies, Madison, Wisconsin) or FTA cards (Whatman, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey) and to investigate the use of whole-genome amplification (WGA) for increasing DNA yields for single nucleotide polymorphism analyses. Buccal specimens were collected from 55 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 52 control children without acute lymphoblastic leukemia in New South Wales, Australia, in 2003-2004. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate polymorphisms in the genes encoding the cytochrome p450 enzyme CYP3A4 (CYP3A4 A392G, also known as CYP3A4*1B) and the steroid xenobiotic receptor (SXR C25385T). Results showed that DNA could be isolated from buccal specimens collected by use of both methods and that yields could be substantially improved with WGA without introducing genotyping error. However, DNA quality was poorer in samples collected by BuccalAmp swabs, and the presence of polymerase chain reaction inhibitors in these samples reduced the sensitivity of quantitative real-time PCR analysis. These findings show that different methods for collecting buccal samples impact on the downstream success of genetic investigations and influence DNA quality after WGA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18326872     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  12 in total

1.  Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis of DNA from buccal cells: detection of mosaicism in three patients.

Authors:  Mallory R Sdano; Rena J Vanzo; Megan M Martin; Erin E Baldwin; Sarah T South; Alan F Rope; William P Allen; Hutton Kearney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Development and initial results of a low cost, disposable, point-of-care testing device for pathogen detection.

Authors:  Jane P Bearinger; Lawrence C Dugan; Brian R Baker; Sara B Hall; Katja Ebert; Valerie Mioulet; Mikidache Madi; Donald P King
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Collection of human genomic DNA from neonates: a comparison between umbilical cord blood and buccal swabs.

Authors:  Amalia S Lehmann; David M Haas; Catherine L McCormick; Todd C Skaar; Jamie L Renbarger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Microbial Degradation of Forensic Samples of Biological Origin: Potential Threat to Human DNA Typing.

Authors:  Hirak Ranjan Dash; Surajit Das
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Feasibility of High-Throughput Genome-Wide Genotyping using DNA from Stored Buccal Cell Samples.

Authors:  Stephanie J Loomis; Lana M Olson; Louis R Pasquale; Janey Wiggs; Daniel Mirel; Andrew Crenshaw; Melissa Parkin; Brandon Rahhal; Stephanie Tetreault; Peter Kraft; Shelley S Tworoger; Jonathan L Haines; Jae H Kang
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2010-05-20

6.  A pyrosequencing-based assay for the rapid detection of the 22q11.2 deletion in DNA from buccal and dried blood spot samples.

Authors:  Deborah Koontz; Kirsten Baecher; Lisa Kobrynski; Stanimila Nikolova; Margaret Gallagher
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Practical aspects of DNA-based forensic studies in dentistry.

Authors:  J Muruganandhan; G Sivakumar
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2011-01

8.  Utility of saliva and hair follicles in donor selection for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimerism monitoring.

Authors:  Gurvinder Kaur; Neeraj Kumar; Ramya Nandakumar; Chowphi C Rapthap; Gaurav Sharma; Shekhar Neolia; Heena Kumra; Prateek Mahalwar; Abhinav Garg; Sunil Kumar; Jasmeet Kaur; Mrinali Hakim; Lalit Kumar; Narinder K Mehra
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

9.  Determinants of DNA yield and purity collected with buccal cell samples.

Authors:  D B M A van Wieren-de Wijer; A H Maitland-van der Zee; A de Boer; S V Belitser; A A Kroon; P W de Leeuw; P Schiffers; R G J H Janssen; C M van Duijn; B H C H Stricker; O H Klungel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Predictors of mother and child DNA yields in buccal cell samples collected in pediatric cancer epidemiologic studies: a report from the Children's Oncology group.

Authors:  Jenny N Poynter; Julie A Ross; Anthony J Hooten; Erica Langer; Crystal Blommer; Logan G Spector
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.