BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bladder neck contracture (BNC) after radical prostatectomy has been reported to occur in 5% to 32% of men after open retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and in 0% to 3% after laparoscopic RRP. Optimal anastomotic closure involves creating a watertight, tension-free anastomosis with well-vascularized, mucosal apposition and correct realignment of the urethra. The cause of BNC is poorly understood; however, it is likely related to multiple factors, including excessive luminal narrowing at the site of reconstruction, local tissue ischemia, failed mucosal apposition, and urinary leakage. In this large series of patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP), we report the incidence of BNC, evaluate the influence of age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical time, and prostate weight on its development and assess follow-up urinary function. METHODS: Between February 2003 and July 2006, 650 consecutive men underwent RLRP at our institution. Patients with aborted or open conversion procedures were excluded from analysis. The mean overall follow-up for the remaining 634 patients was 19.5 months. Patients presenting with symptoms of outlet obstruction were evaluated with cystoscopy to confirm a BNC. Comparisons of age, BMI, EBL, operative time, and prostate weight were performed using the Student t-test and chi-square analysis. RESULTS: BNC was the diagnosis in seven patients (1.1%) with a mean time of presentation of 4.8 (3-12) months postoperatively. The BNC patients had comparable mean age, BMI, prostate weight, and EBL to the non-BNC cohort. Their operative time, however, was significantly longer (283 v 225 min., P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BNC after radical prostatectomy is 2.2% in a large series of men undergoing RLRP. The diagnosis was made within 1 year. No significant impact on urinary continence or quality-of-life urinary function was observed after BNC management. A running anastomosis, better visualization, improved instrument maneuverability, and decreased blood loss may account for such a low rate.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Bladder neck contracture (BNC) after radical prostatectomy has been reported to occur in 5% to 32% of men after open retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and in 0% to 3% after laparoscopic RRP. Optimal anastomotic closure involves creating a watertight, tension-free anastomosis with well-vascularized, mucosal apposition and correct realignment of the urethra. The cause of BNC is poorly understood; however, it is likely related to multiple factors, including excessive luminal narrowing at the site of reconstruction, local tissue ischemia, failed mucosal apposition, and urinary leakage. In this large series of patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP), we report the incidence of BNC, evaluate the influence of age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical time, and prostate weight on its development and assess follow-up urinary function. METHODS: Between February 2003 and July 2006, 650 consecutive men underwent RLRP at our institution. Patients with aborted or open conversion procedures were excluded from analysis. The mean overall follow-up for the remaining 634 patients was 19.5 months. Patients presenting with symptoms of outlet obstruction were evaluated with cystoscopy to confirm a BNC. Comparisons of age, BMI, EBL, operative time, and prostate weight were performed using the Student t-test and chi-square analysis. RESULTS: BNC was the diagnosis in seven patients (1.1%) with a mean time of presentation of 4.8 (3-12) months postoperatively. The BNC patients had comparable mean age, BMI, prostate weight, and EBL to the non-BNC cohort. Their operative time, however, was significantly longer (283 v 225 min., P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BNC after radical prostatectomy is 2.2% in a large series of men undergoing RLRP. The diagnosis was made within 1 year. No significant impact on urinary continence or quality-of-life urinary function was observed after BNC management. A running anastomosis, better visualization, improved instrument maneuverability, and decreased blood loss may account for such a low rate.
Authors: Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Gita M Schoeppler; Dirk Zaak; Dirk-Andre Clevert; Petra Schuhmann; Oliver Reich; Michael Seitz; Wael Y Khoder; Michael Staehler; Christian G Stief; Alexander Buchner Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: D Pfalzgraf; T Worst; J Kranz; J Steffens; G Salomon; M Fisch; C P Reiß; M W Vetterlein; C M Rosenbaum Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Graham R Hale; Mohammed Shahait; David I Lee; Daniel J Lee; Ryan W Dobbs Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 2.711