RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Total quality in coagulation testing is a necessary requisite to achieve clinically reliable results. Evidence was provided that poor standardization in the extra-analytical phases of the testing process has the greatest influence on test results, though little information is available so far on prevalence and type of pre-analytical variability in coagulation testing. METHODS: The present study was designed to describe all pre-analytical problems on inpatients routine and stat samples recorded in our coagulation laboratory over a 2-year period and clustered according to their source (hospital departments). RESULTS: Overall, pre-analytic problems were identified in 5.5% of the specimens. Although the highest frequency was observed for paediatric departments, in no case was the comparison of the prevalence among the different hospital departments statistically significant. The more frequent problems could be referred to samples not received in the laboratory following a doctor's order (49.3%), haemolysis (19.5%), clotting (14.2%) and inappropriate volume (13.7%). Specimens not received prevailed in the intensive care unit, surgical and clinical departments, whereas clotted and haemolysed specimens were those most frequently recorded from paediatric and emergency departments, respectively. The present investigation demonstrates a high prevalence of pre-analytical problems affecting samples for coagulation testing. CONCLUSIONS: Full implementation of a total quality system, encompassing a systematic error tracking system, is a valuable tool to achieve meaningful information on the local pre-analytic processes most susceptible to errors, enabling considerations on specific responsibilities and providing the ideal basis for an efficient feedback within the hospital departments.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Total quality in coagulation testing is a necessary requisite to achieve clinically reliable results. Evidence was provided that poor standardization in the extra-analytical phases of the testing process has the greatest influence on test results, though little information is available so far on prevalence and type of pre-analytical variability in coagulation testing. METHODS: The present study was designed to describe all pre-analytical problems on inpatients routine and stat samples recorded in our coagulation laboratory over a 2-year period and clustered according to their source (hospital departments). RESULTS: Overall, pre-analytic problems were identified in 5.5% of the specimens. Although the highest frequency was observed for paediatric departments, in no case was the comparison of the prevalence among the different hospital departments statistically significant. The more frequent problems could be referred to samples not received in the laboratory following a doctor's order (49.3%), haemolysis (19.5%), clotting (14.2%) and inappropriate volume (13.7%). Specimens not received prevailed in the intensive care unit, surgical and clinical departments, whereas clotted and haemolysed specimens were those most frequently recorded from paediatric and emergency departments, respectively. The present investigation demonstrates a high prevalence of pre-analytical problems affecting samples for coagulation testing. CONCLUSIONS: Full implementation of a total quality system, encompassing a systematic error tracking system, is a valuable tool to achieve meaningful information on the local pre-analytic processes most susceptible to errors, enabling considerations on specific responsibilities and providing the ideal basis for an efficient feedback within the hospital departments.
Authors: Euan J McCaughey; Elia Vecellio; Rebecca Lake; Ling Li; Leslie Burnett; Douglas Chesher; Stephen Braye; Mark Mackay; Stephanie Gay; Tony C Badrick; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou Journal: Clin Biochem Rev Date: 2016-12
Authors: Khalid Alshaghdali; Tessie Y Alcantara; Raja Rezgui; Charlie P Cruz; Munif H Alshammary; Yasser A Almotairi; Jerold C Alcantara Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 1.147
Authors: Woo Jae Kwoun; Jeong Yeal Ahn; Pil Whan Park; Yiel Hea Seo; Kyung Hee Kim; Ja Young Seo; Ji Hun Jeong; Hwan Tae Lee Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: G Troiano; N Nante; A Fanelli; G M Rossolini; P Pecile; P Bordonaro; B Peruzzi; M Lo Rubbio; T Tanini; C Duranti; G Piccinno; F Niccolini Journal: J Prev Med Hyg Date: 2020-04-02
Authors: Gabriel Lima-Oliveira; Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Luca Salvagno; Martina Montagnana; Geraldo Picheth; Gian Cesare Guidi Journal: Biochem Med (Zagreb) Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.313