Literature DB >> 18324566

Smoking reduction fails to improve clinical and biological markers of cardiac disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Anne M Joseph1, Stephen S Hecht, Sharon E Murphy, Harry Lando, Steven G Carmella, Myron Gross, Robin Bliss, Chap T Le, Dorothy K Hatsukami.   

Abstract

Cigarette reduction has been proposed as a treatment goal for smokers who are not interested in stopping completely. This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine the effect of a smoking reduction intervention on smoking behavior, symptoms of heart disease, and biomarkers of tobacco exposure. It included 152 patients with heart disease who did not intend to stop smoking in the next 30 days. Participants were randomly assigned to smoking reduction (SR) or usual care (UC). SR subjects received counseling and nicotine replacement therapy to encourage > or =50% reduction in cigarettes per day (CPD). They were followed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months to assess smoking, heart disease symptoms, quality of life and nicotine, cotinine, carbon monoxide (CO), white blood cell (WBC) count, fibrinogen, hs-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), F2-isoprostane, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL), and 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HOP). At 6 months SR participants reduced by 10.9 CPD, compared with 7.4 CPD in UC (difference NS). At 18 months, 9/78 SR vs. 9/74 UC participants quit smoking. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in angina, quality of life or adverse events, nicotine, cotinine, CO, WBC count, fibrinogen, hs-CRP, F2-isoprostane, total NNAL or 1-HOP levels at any time point. To determine if smoking reduction, regardless of treatment condition, was associated with improved outcomes, we compared all subjects at 6 months to baseline (mean reduction in CPD from 27.4 to 18.1, p<.01). There were no significant changes in outcome variables except CO, which decreased by 5.5 ppm (p<.01). There were also no significant improvements considering only subjects who reduced by > or =50%, or those who had no history of reduction prior to enrollment in the study. The SR intervention did not significantly reduce CPD or toxin exposure, or improve smoking cessation or clinical outcomes compared to UC. These results emphasize the importance of abstinence for smokers with heart disease to minimize health risks from tobacco.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324566      PMCID: PMC4110889          DOI: 10.1080/14622200801901948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  21 in total

1.  Effect of smoking reduction and cessation on cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  B Eliasson; A Hjalmarson; E Kruse; B Landfeldt
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Reducing tobacco harm: research challenges and issues.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; John Slade; Neal L Benowitz; Gary A Giovino; Ellen R Gritz; Scott Leischow; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Hospital- and clinic-based smoking cessation interventions for smokers with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Carey Conley Thomson; Nancy A Rigotti
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 4.  Does smoking reduction increase future cessation and decrease disease risk? A qualitative review.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Effects of watercress consumption on urinary metabolites of nicotine in smokers.

Authors:  S S Hecht; S G Carmella; S E Murphy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Does smoking reduction result in reduction of biomarkers associated with harm? A pilot study using a nicotine inhaler.

Authors:  R D Hurt; G A Croghan; T D Wolter; I T Croghan; K P Offord; G M Williams; M V Djordjevic; J P Richie; A M Jeffrey
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Effects of reduced cigarette smoking on the uptake of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen.

Authors:  Stephen S Hecht; Sharon E Murphy; Steven G Carmella; Cheryl L Zimmerman; London Losey; Irene Kramarczuk; Mikel R Roe; Susan S Puumala; Y Shelby Li; Chap Le; Joni Jensen; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Smoking reduction, smoking cessation, and incidence of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction in Denmark 1976-1998: a pooled cohort study.

Authors:  N S Godtfredsen; M Osler; J Vestbo; I Andersen; E Prescott
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Epidemiology of smoking-induced cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  David M Burns
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 10.  Environmental tobacco smoke and ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Malcolm R Law; Nicholas J Wald
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

View more
  21 in total

1.  Comparing an immediate cessation versus reduction approach to smokeless tobacco cessation.

Authors:  Katherine R Schiller; Xianghua Luo; Amanda J Anderson; Joni A Jensen; Sharon S Allen; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  Do smoking reduction interventions promote cessation in smokers not ready to quit?

Authors:  Taghrid Asfar; Jon O Ebbert; Robert C Klesges; George E Relyea
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  A lack of association between severity of nicotine withdrawal and individual differences in compensatory nicotine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Paul R Pentel; Danielle Burroughs; Mylissa D Staley; Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The ratio of a urinary tobacco-specific lung carcinogen metabolite to cotinine is significantly higher in passive than in active smokers.

Authors:  Rachel I Vogel; Steven G Carmella; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers: research achievements and future implications.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; C Anderson Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Raymond Niaura; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Nicotine Versus Placebo Electronic Cigarettes on Smoking Reduction Among Young Adult Smokers.

Authors:  Tuo-Yen Tseng; Jamie S Ostroff; Alena Campo; Meghan Gerard; Thomas Kirchner; John Rotrosen; Donna Shelley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Characterizing use patterns and perceptions of relative harm in dual users of electronic and tobacco cigarettes.

Authors:  Olga Rass; Lauren R Pacek; Patrick S Johnson; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Smoking Cessation for Smokers Not Ready to Quit: Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Ayesha Ali; Cameron M Kaplan; Karen J Derefinko; Robert C Klesges
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  C-reactive protein as a predictor of disease in smokers and former smokers: a review.

Authors:  S Tonstad; J L Cowan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Developing the science base for reducing tobacco harm.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Anne M Joseph; Mark Lesage; Joni Jensen; Sharon E Murphy; Paul R Pentel; Michael Kotlyar; Eugene Borgida; Chap Le; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.