Literature DB >> 14734700

Effects of reduced cigarette smoking on the uptake of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen.

Stephen S Hecht1, Sharon E Murphy, Steven G Carmella, Cheryl L Zimmerman, London Losey, Irene Kramarczuk, Mikel R Roe, Susan S Puumala, Y Shelby Li, Chap Le, Joni Jensen, Dorothy K Hatsukami.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on carcinogen uptake in smokers who reduce their smoking. To determine whether reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day would lead to a corresponding reduction in carcinogen uptake, we measured levels of metabolites of the tobacco-specific lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in the urine of smokers who reduced their smoking for up to 26 weeks.
METHODS: We recruited 153 smokers, of whom 151 were randomly assigned to a reduction group or a waitlist group. In the reduction group of 102 smokers, we measured the metabolites 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and its glucuronides (NNAL-Gluc) at two baseline times and at weeks 4, 6, 8, 12, and 26 after baseline. Smokers were then expected to reduce their number of cigarettes per day by 25% in weeks 0-2, 50% in weeks 2-4, and 75% in weeks 4-6 and to maintain the reduced level through week 26. In the waitlist group of 49 smokers, four baseline measurements over 7 weeks were made to assess the longitudinal stability of the metabolite measurements, and then the smokers began the reduction program. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: For waitlist and reduction groups results were comparable. Statistically significant reductions in the lung carcinogen metabolites were observed at most intervals as smokers reduced the number of cigarettes smoked each day. However, the observed decreases were generally modest, always proportionally less than the reductions in cigarettes smoked per day, and sometimes transient. For example, among the 65 individuals in the reduction group who reduced cigarettes per day by 40% or more during weeks 4-12 after baseline, mean decreases in cigarettes per day were 53% (week 4), 74% (week 6), 75% (week 8), and 74% (week 12); whereas the corresponding mean reductions in NNAL plus NNAL-Gluc were 29%, 33%, 37%, and 29%. (P<.001 for all NNAL plus NNAL-Gluc values)
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant reductions in levels of urinary metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen were achieved by reduction in smoking, but for most smokers, reductions were modest and transient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14734700     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  39 in total

Review 1.  The feasibility of smoking reduction: an update.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  Biomarkers to assess the utility of potential reduced exposure tobacco products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Stephen I Rennard; Cheryl Oncken; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  A lack of association between severity of nicotine withdrawal and individual differences in compensatory nicotine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Paul R Pentel; Danielle Burroughs; Mylissa D Staley; Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter?

Authors:  Corinne G Husten
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Gradual and immediate nicotine reduction result in similar low-dose nicotine self-administration.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Melissa E Levin; Rachel L Schassburger; Deanne M Buffalari; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  The ratio of a urinary tobacco-specific lung carcinogen metabolite to cotinine is significantly higher in passive than in active smokers.

Authors:  Rachel I Vogel; Steven G Carmella; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers: research achievements and future implications.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; C Anderson Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Raymond Niaura; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  Tobacco carcinogen metabolites and DNA adducts as biomarkers in head and neck cancer: potential screening tools and prognostic indicators.

Authors:  Samir S Khariwala; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 9.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Nicotine metabolism in African Americans and European Americans: variation in glucuronidation by ethnicity and UGT2B10 haplotype.

Authors:  Jeannette Zinggeler Berg; Jesse Mason; Angela J Boettcher; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Sharon E Murphy
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 4.030

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.