Melissa J Whitrow1, Seeromanie Harding. 1. Medical Research Council, Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK. melissa@sphsu.mrc.ac.uk
Abstract
RATIONALE: The relative contribution of body proportion and social exposures to ethnic differences in lung function has not previously been reported in the United Kingdom. OBJECTIVES: To examine ethnic differences in lung function in relation to anthropometry and social and psychosocial factors in early adolescence. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 3,924 pupils aged 11 to 13 years, of whom 80% were ethnic minorities with satisfactory lung function measures. Data were collected on economic disadvantage, psychological well-being, tobacco exposure, height, FEV(1), and FVC. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The lowest FEV(1) was observed for Black Caribbean/African children after adjusting for standing height (SH) (white boys: 2.475 L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.442-2.509; white girls: 2.449 L; 95% CI, 2.464-2.535]; Black Caribbean boys: -14% [95% CI, -16 to -12]; Black Caribbean girls: -13% [95% CI, -16 to -11]; Black African boys: -15% [95% CI, -17 to -13]; Black African girls: -17% [95% CI, -19 to -14]; Indian boys: -13% [95% CI, -16 to -11]; Indian girls: -11% [95% CI, -14 to -8]; Pakistani/Bangladeshi boys: -7% [95% CI, -9 to -5]; Pakistani/Bangladeshi girls: -9% [95% CI, -11 to -6]). Adjustment for upper body segment instead of SH achieved a further reduction in ethnic differences of 41 to 51% for children of Black African origin and 26 to 39% for the other groups. Overcrowding (boys) and poor psychological well-being (boys and girls) were independent correlates of FEV(1), explaining up to a further 10% of ethnic differences. Similar patterns were observed for FVC. Social exposures were also related to height components. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in upper body segment explained more of the ethnic differences in lung function than SH, particularly among Black Caribbeans/African subjects. Social correlates had a smaller but significant impact. Future research needs to consider how differential development of lung capacity is compromised by the social patterning of growth trajectories.
RATIONALE: The relative contribution of body proportion and social exposures to ethnic differences in lung function has not previously been reported in the United Kingdom. OBJECTIVES: To examine ethnic differences in lung function in relation to anthropometry and social and psychosocial factors in early adolescence. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 3,924 pupils aged 11 to 13 years, of whom 80% were ethnic minorities with satisfactory lung function measures. Data were collected on economic disadvantage, psychological well-being, tobacco exposure, height, FEV(1), and FVC. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The lowest FEV(1) was observed for Black Caribbean/African children after adjusting for standing height (SH) (white boys: 2.475 L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.442-2.509; white girls: 2.449 L; 95% CI, 2.464-2.535]; Black Caribbean boys: -14% [95% CI, -16 to -12]; Black Caribbean girls: -13% [95% CI, -16 to -11]; Black African boys: -15% [95% CI, -17 to -13]; Black African girls: -17% [95% CI, -19 to -14]; Indian boys: -13% [95% CI, -16 to -11]; Indian girls: -11% [95% CI, -14 to -8]; Pakistani/Bangladeshi boys: -7% [95% CI, -9 to -5]; Pakistani/Bangladeshi girls: -9% [95% CI, -11 to -6]). Adjustment for upper body segment instead of SH achieved a further reduction in ethnic differences of 41 to 51% for children of Black African origin and 26 to 39% for the other groups. Overcrowding (boys) and poor psychological well-being (boys and girls) were independent correlates of FEV(1), explaining up to a further 10% of ethnic differences. Similar patterns were observed for FVC. Social exposures were also related to height components. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in upper body segment explained more of the ethnic differences in lung function than SH, particularly among Black Caribbeans/African subjects. Social correlates had a smaller but significant impact. Future research needs to consider how differential development of lung capacity is compromised by the social patterning of growth trajectories.
Authors: Ah-Fong Hoo; Janet Stocks; Sooky Lum; Angie M Wade; Rosemary A Castle; Kate L Costeloe; Carol Dezateux Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Joseph Fawke; Sooky Lum; Jane Kirkby; Enid Hennessy; Neil Marlow; Victoria Rowell; Sue Thomas; Janet Stocks Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daniel O Obaseki; Gregory E Erhabor; Olayemi F Awopeju; Olufemi O Adewole; Bamidele O Adeniyi; Emerita A Sonia Buist; Peter G Burney Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-05
Authors: Philip H Quanjer; Sanja Stanojevic; Tim J Cole; Xaver Baur; Graham L Hall; Bruce H Culver; Paul L Enright; John L Hankinson; Mary S M Ip; Jinping Zheng; Janet Stocks Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Ana Maria B Menezes; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Fernando P Hartwig; Rogelio Perez-Padilla; Denise P Gigante; Fernando C Barros; Isabel O Oliveira; Gustavo D Ferreira; Bernardo L Horta Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Sooky Lum; Vassiliki Bountziouka; Samatha Sonnappa; Angie Wade; Tim J Cole; Seeromanie Harding; Jonathan C K Wells; Chris Griffiths; Philip Treleaven; Rachel Bonner; Jane Kirkby; Simon Lee; Emma Raywood; Sarah Legg; Dave Sears; Philippa Cottam; Colin Feyeraband; Janet Stocks Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Thomas Astell-Burt; Maria J Maynard; Erik Lenguerrand; Melissa J Whitrow; Oarabile R Molaodi; Seeromanie Harding Journal: Health Place Date: 2013-07-21 Impact factor: 4.078