Literature DB >> 18323507

Misclassified tissue volumes in Alzheimer disease patients with white matter hyperintensities: importance of lesion segmentation procedures for volumetric analysis.

Naama Levy-Cooperman1, Joel Ramirez, Nancy J Lobaugh, Sandra E Black.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: MRI-based quantification of gray and white matter volume is common in studies involving elderly patient populations. The aim of the present study was to describe the effects of not accounting for subcortical white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on tissue volumes in Alzheimer Disease patients with varying degrees of WMH (mild: n=19, moderate: n=22, severe: n=18).
METHODS: An automated tissue segmentation protocol that was optimized for an elderly population, a brain regional parcellation procedure, and a lesion segmentation protocol were applied to measure tissue volumes (whole brain and regional lobar volumes) with and without lesion segmentation to quantify the volume of misclassified tissue.
RESULTS: After application of the tissue segmentation protocol and lesion analysis, mean total percentage misclassified volume across all subjects was 2% (17.9 cm(3)) of whole brain volume (corrected for total intracranial capacity). Mean percentage of misclassified tissue volumes for the severe group was 4.8% of whole brain, which translates to a mean volume 42.2 cm(3). Gray matter volume was most overestimated in the severe group, where 6.4% of the total gray matter volume was derived from misclassified WMH. The regional analysis showed that frontal (41%, 7.4 cm(3)) and inferior parietal (18%, 3.25 cm(3)) lobes were most affected by tissue misclassification.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based volumetric studies of Alzheimer Disease that do not account for WMH can expect an erroneous inflation of gray or white matter volumes, especially in the frontal and inferior parietal regions. To avoid this source of error, MRI-based volumetric studies in patient populations susceptible to hyperintensities should include a WMH segmentation protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18323507     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  18 in total

1.  Handedness, motor skills and maturation of the corticospinal tract in the adolescent brain.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Hervé; Gabriel Leonard; Michel Perron; Bruce Pike; Alain Pitiot; Louis Richer; Suzanne Veillette; Zdenka Pausova; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The AGES-Reykjavik study atlases: Non-linear multi-spectral template and atlases for studies of the ageing brain.

Authors:  Lars Forsberg; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Jesper Fredriksson; Asdis Egilsdottir; Bryndis Oskarsdottir; Olafur Kjartansson; Mark A van Buchem; Lenore J Launer; Vilmundur Gudnason; Alex Zijdenbos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Brain atrophy in cerebral small vessel diseases: Extent, consequences, technical limitations and perspectives: The HARNESS initiative.

Authors:  François De Guio; Marco Duering; Franz Fazekas; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Steven M Greenberg; Leonardo Pantoni; Agnès Aghetti; Eric E Smith; Joanna Wardlaw; Eric Jouvent
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Speech network regional involvement in bulbar ALS: a multimodal structural MRI study.

Authors:  Sanjana Shellikeri; Matthew Myers; Sandra E Black; Agessandro Abrahao; Lorne Zinman; Yana Yunusova
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.092

5.  White matter signal abnormality quality differentiates mild cognitive impairment that converts to Alzheimer's disease from nonconverters.

Authors:  Emily R Lindemer; David H Salat; Eric E Smith; Khoa Nguyen; Bruce Fischl; Douglas N Greve
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  A Robust Modular Automated Neuroimaging Pipeline for Model Inputs to TheVirtualBrain.

Authors:  Noah Frazier-Logue; Justin Wang; Zheng Wang; Devin Sodums; Anisha Khosla; Alexandria D Samson; Anthony R McIntosh; Kelly Shen
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  The effects of white matter disease on the accuracy of automated segmentation.

Authors:  Helmet T Karim; Carmen Andreescu; Rebecca L MacCloud; Meryl A Butters; Charles F Reynolds; Howard J Aizenstein; Dana L Tudorascu
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.376

8.  Validation of automated white matter hyperintensity segmentation.

Authors:  Sean D Smart; Michael J Firbank; John T O'Brien
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2011-09-06

9.  Automated identification of brain tumors from single MR images based on segmentation with refined patient-specific priors.

Authors:  Ana Sanjuán; Cathy J Price; Laura Mancini; Goulven Josse; Alice Grogan; Adam K Yamamoto; Sharon Geva; Alex P Leff; Tarek A Yousry; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Eric E Smith; Geert J Biessels; Charlotte Cordonnier; Franz Fazekas; Richard Frayne; Richard I Lindley; John T O'Brien; Frederik Barkhof; Oscar R Benavente; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Monique Breteler; Hugues Chabriat; Charles Decarli; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Nick C Fox; Steven Greenberg; Vladimir Hachinski; Ingo Kilimann; Vincent Mok; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Leonardo Pantoni; Oliver Speck; Blossom C M Stephan; Stefan Teipel; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Christopher Chen; Colin Smith; Mark van Buchem; Bo Norrving; Philip B Gorelick; Martin Dichgans
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.