Literature DB >> 18321882

Rapid point-of-care test to detect broad ranges of protective antigen-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations in recipients of the U.S.-licensed anthrax vaccine.

Diane R Bienek1, Raymond E Biagini, David G Charlton, Jerome P Smith, Deborah L Sammons, Shirley A Robertson.   

Abstract

Currently, there is no routine monitoring of an immune response to the anthrax vaccine. Simple on-site tests are needed to evaluate the antibody response of anthrax-vaccinated individuals in the Armed Forces and others at high risk. Using a prototype lateral flow assay (LFA) (R. E. Biagini, D. L. Sammons, J. P. Smith, B. A. MacKenzie, C. A. F. Striley, J. E. Snawder, S. A. Robertson, and C. P. Quinn, Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13:541-546, 2006), we investigated the agreement between a validated anthrax protective antigen (PA) immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the LFA for 335 unvaccinated and vaccinated subjects. We also investigated the performance of the LFA under the following conditions: thermal shock (i.e., thermal cycling between temperature extremes), high temperature/high relative humidity, high temperature/low relative humidity, and low temperature/low relative humidity. With the anti-PA ELISA used as a standard, the LFA was shown to be optimally diagnostic at 11 microg/ml anti-PA-specific IgG. At this concentration, the LFA specificity and sensitivity were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97% to 100%) and 92% (CI, 88% to 97%), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded an area under the curve value of 0.988 (CI, 0.976 to 1.00), suggesting that the LFA is an extremely accurate diagnostic test. For < or = 4 or > or = 50 microg/ml PA-specific IgG, the LFA results for each environmental condition were identical to those obtained in the laboratory. These data indicate that this rapid point-of-care test would be a feasible tool in monitoring the serological antibody responses of individuals that have been vaccinated against anthrax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321882      PMCID: PMC2292649          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00473-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  25 in total

1.  The impact of incomplete vaccination schedules on the magnitude and duration of protective antigen-specific IgG responses in recipients of the US licensed anthrax vaccine.

Authors:  Linda A Lininger; Malford E Cullum; Mark B Lyles; Diane R Bienek
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Comparative efficacy of Bacillus anthracis live spore vaccine and protective antigen vaccine against anthrax in the guinea pig.

Authors:  S F Little; G B Knudson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Development of antibodies to protective antigen and lethal factor components of anthrax toxin in humans and guinea pigs and their relevance to protective immunity.

Authors:  P C Turnbull; M G Broster; J A Carman; R J Manchee; J Melling
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Positive control wells: a potential answer to remote-area quality assurance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C T Lon; S Alcantara; J Luchavez; R Tsuyuoka; D Bell
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  Antibody response to a delayed booster dose of anthrax vaccine and botulinum toxoid.

Authors:  Phillip R Pittman; Dallas Hack; Joseph Mangiafico; Paul Gibbs; Kelly T McKee; Arthur M Friedlander; Maria H Sjogren
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Qualification and performance characteristics of a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human lgG antibodies to anthrax lethal factor antigen.

Authors:  Cheryl L Selinsky; Vanessa D Whitlow; Larry R Smith; David C Kaslow; Holly M Horton
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 1.856

7.  Mass value assignment of total and subclass immunoglobulin G in a human standard anthrax reference serum.

Authors:  V A Semenova; E Steward-Clark; K L Stamey; T H Taylor; D S Schmidt; S K Martin; N Marano; C P Quinn
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-09

8.  Defining a serological correlate of protection in rabbits for a recombinant anthrax vaccine.

Authors:  S F Little; B E Ivins; P F Fellows; M L M Pitt; S L W Norris; G P Andrews
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Comparative efficacy of experimental anthrax vaccine candidates against inhalation anthrax in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  B E Ivins; M L Pitt; P F Fellows; J W Farchaus; G E Benner; D M Waag; S F Little; G W Anderson; P H Gibbs; A M Friedlander
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Comparison of a multiplexed fluorescent covalent microsphere immunoassay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of human immunoglobulin G antibodies to anthrax toxins.

Authors:  Raymond E Biagini; Deborah L Sammons; Jerome P Smith; Barbara A MacKenzie; Cynthia A F Striley; Vera Semenova; Evelen Steward-Clark; Karen Stamey; Alison E Freeman; Conrad P Quinn; John E Snawder
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Antimicrobial activity of nanoemulsion in combination with cetylpyridinium chloride in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Yoon Y Hwang; Karthikeyan Ramalingam; Diane R Bienek; Valerie Lee; Tao You; Rene Alvarez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Temperature and the field stability of a dengue rapid diagnostic test in the tropics.

Authors:  Koukeo Phommasone; Onanong Sengvilaipaseuth; Xavier de Lamballerie; Manivanh Vongsouvath; Ooyanong Phonemixay; Stuart D Blacksell; Paul N Newton; Audrey Dubot-Pérès
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.345

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.