Literature DB >> 18321652

Roles of dorsal column pathway and transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 in augmentation of cerebral blood flow by upper cervical spinal cord stimulation in rats.

X Yang1, J P Farber, M Wu, R D Foreman, C Qin.   

Abstract

Clinical and basic studies have indicated that upper cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) significantly increases cerebral blood flow (CBF), but the mechanisms are incompletely understood. This investigation was conducted to differentiate between stimulation of dorsal column fibers and upper cervical spinal cord cell bodies in cSCS-induced increases in CBF and decreases in cerebrovascular resistance (CVR). cSCS (50 Hz, 0.2 ms, 1 min) was applied on the left C1-C2 dorsal column of pentobarbital anesthetized, ventilated and paralyzed male rats. Laser Doppler flowmetry probes were placed bilaterally over the parietal cortex, and arterial pressure was monitored. cSCS at 30%, 60%, and 90% of motor threshold (MT) produced vasodilation bilaterally in cerebral cortices. Subsequently, cSCS was applied at 90% MT, and ipsilateral responses were recorded. Ibotenic acid (0.3 mg/ml, 0.1 ml) placed on dorsal surface of C1-C2 (n=7) to suppress cell body activity, did not affect cSCS-induced %DeltaCBF (42.5+/-8.1% vs. 36.8+/-7.1%, P>0.05) and %DeltaCVR (-19.4+/-4.2% vs. -15.2+/-5.6%, P>0.05). However, bilateral transection of the dorsal column at rostral C1 (n=8) abolished cSCS-induced changes in CBF and CVR. Also, rostral C1 transection (n=7) abolished cSCS-induced changes in CBF and CVR. Resinferatoxin (RTX), an ultrapotent transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) agonist, was used to inactivate TRPV1 containing nerve fibers/cell bodies. RTX (2 microg/ml, 0.1 ml) placed on the C1-C2 spinal cord (n=7) did not affect cSCS-induced %DeltaCBF (60.2+/-8.1% vs. 46.3+/-7.7%, P>0.05) and %DeltaCVR (-25.5+/-3.5% vs. -21.4+/-8.9%, P>0.05). However, i.v. RTX (2 microg/kg, n=9) decreased cSCS-induced %DeltaCBF from 65.0+/-9.5% to 27.4+/-7.2% (P<0.05) and %DeltaCVR from -28.0+/-7.6% to -14.8+/-4.2% (P<0.05). These results indicated that cSCS-increases in CBF and decreases in CVR occurred via rostral spinal dorsal column fibers and did not depend upon C1-C2 cell bodies. Also, our results suggested that cerebral but not spinal TRPV1 was involved in cSCS-induced cerebral vasodilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321652      PMCID: PMC2396529          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  55 in total

1.  Cervical spinal cord stimulation improves neurological dysfunction induced by cerebral vasospasm.

Authors:  M Gurelik; M Kayabas; O Karadag; H M Goksel; A Akyuz; S Topaktas
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Somatosensory and auditory relay nucleus in the rostral part of the ventrolateral medulla: a morphological study in the cat.

Authors:  H Kamiya; K Itoh; Y Yasui; T Ino; N Mizuno
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  The effects of cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) on experimental stroke.

Authors:  T Matsui; Y Hosobuchi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Electrical stimulation of cervical vagal afferents. II. Central relays for behavioral antinociception and arterial blood pressure decreases.

Authors:  A Randich; K Ren; G F Gebhart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Treatment of cerebral ischemia with electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Y Hosobuchi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Spinal cord stimulation reducing infarct volume in a model of focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

Authors:  Oren Sagher; Dah-Luen Huang; Richard F Keep
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Selective electrical stimulation of postganglionic cerebrovascular parasympathetic nerve fibers originating from the sphenopalatine ganglion enhances cortical blood flow in the rat.

Authors:  N Suzuki; J E Hardebo; J Kåhrström; C Owman
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review.

Authors:  Tracy Cameron
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Human brain endothelium: coexpression and function of vanilloid and endocannabinoid receptors.

Authors:  Susanne Andrea Golech; Richard M McCarron; Ye Chen; Joliet Bembry; Frederick Lenz; Raphael Mechoulam; Esther Shohami; Maria Spatz
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-06

10.  A case of post-traumatic cervicogenic headache treated by cervical cord stimulation.

Authors:  A Dario; C Scamoni; S Peron; G Tomei
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.277

View more
  5 in total

1.  Modulation of neuronal activity in dorsal column nuclei by upper cervical spinal cord stimulation in rats.

Authors:  C Qin; X Yang; M Wu; J P Farber; B Linderoth; R D Foreman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Cervical spinal cord stimulation for prevention and treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical and radiographic outcomes of a prospective single-center clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Konstantin V Slavin; Prasad Vannemreddy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Long-Term Continuous Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation Exerts Neuroprotective Effects in Experimental Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ken Kuwahara; Tatsuya Sasaki; Takao Yasuhara; Masahiro Kameda; Yosuke Okazaki; Kakeru Hosomoto; Ittetsu Kin; Mihoko Okazaki; Satoru Yabuno; Satoshi Kawauchi; Yousuke Tomita; Michiari Umakoshi; Kyohei Kin; Jun Morimoto; Jea-Young Lee; Naoki Tajiri; Cesar V Borlongan; Isao Date
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 4.  An Examination of Mobile Spinal Cord Stimulators on Treating Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Zhen-Jie Wang; Takao Yasuhara
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2021-03-30

5.  Spinal cord stimulation exerts neuroprotective effects against experimental Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Aiko Shinko; Takashi Agari; Masahiro Kameda; Takao Yasuhara; Akihiko Kondo; Judith Thomas Tayra; Kenichiro Sato; Tatsuya Sasaki; Susumu Sasada; Hayato Takeuchi; Takaaki Wakamori; Cesario V Borlongan; Isao Date
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.