BACKGROUND: Improved quantitative understanding of in vivo leaflet geometry in ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is needed to improve reparative techniques, yet few data are available due to current imaging limitations. Using marker technology we tested the hypotheses that IMR (1) occurs chiefly during early systole; (2) affects primarily the valve region contiguous with the myocardial ischemic insult; and (3) results in systolic leaflet edge restriction. METHODS: Eleven sheep had radiopaque markers sutured as five opposing pairs along the anterior (A(1)-E(1)) and posterior (A(2)-E(2)) mitral leaflet free edges from the anterior commissure (A(1)-A(2)) to the posterior commissure (E(1)-E(2)). Immediately postoperatively, biplane videofluoroscopy was used to obtain 4D marker coordinates before and during acute proximal left circumflex artery occlusion. Regional mitral orifice area (MOA) was calculated in the anterior (Ant-MOA), middle (Mid-MOA), and posterior (Post-MOA) mitral orifice segments during early systole (EarlyS), mid systole (MidS), and end systole (EndS). MOA was normalized to zero (minimum orifice opening) at baseline EndS. Tenting height was the distance of the midpoint of paired markers to the mitral annular plane at EndS. RESULTS: Acute ischemia increased echocardiographic MR grade (0.5+/-0.3 vs 2.3+/-0.7, p<0.01) and MOA in all regions at EarlyS, MidS, and EndS: Ant-MOA (7+/-10 vs 22+/-19 mm(2), 1+/-2 vs 18+/-16 mm(2), 0 vs 17+/-15 mm(2)); Mid-MOA (9+/-13 vs 25+/-17 mm(2), 3+/-6 vs 21+/-19 mm(2), 0 vs 25+/-17 mm(2)); and Post-MOA (8+/-10 vs 25+/-16, 2+/-4 vs 22+/-13 mm(2), 0 vs 23+/-13 mm(2)), all p<0.05. There was no change in MOA throughout systole (EarlyS vs MidS vs EndS) during baseline conditions or ischemia. Tenting height increased with ischemia near the central and the anterior commissure leaflet edges (B(1)-B(2): 7.1+/-1.8mm vs 7.9+/-1.7 mm, C(1)-C(2): 6.9+/-1.3mm vs 8.0+/-1.5mm, both p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MOA during ischemia was larger throughout systole, indicating that acute IMR in this setting is a holosystolic phenomenon. Despite discrete postero-lateral myocardial ischemia, Post-MOA was not disproportionately larger. Acute ovine IMR was associated with leaflet restriction near the central and the anterior commissure leaflet edges. This entire constellation of annular, valvular, and subvalvular ischemic alterations should be considered in the approach to mitral repair for IMR.
BACKGROUND: Improved quantitative understanding of in vivo leaflet geometry in ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is needed to improve reparative techniques, yet few data are available due to current imaging limitations. Using marker technology we tested the hypotheses that IMR (1) occurs chiefly during early systole; (2) affects primarily the valve region contiguous with the myocardial ischemic insult; and (3) results in systolic leaflet edge restriction. METHODS: Eleven sheep had radiopaque markers sutured as five opposing pairs along the anterior (A(1)-E(1)) and posterior (A(2)-E(2)) mitral leaflet free edges from the anterior commissure (A(1)-A(2)) to the posterior commissure (E(1)-E(2)). Immediately postoperatively, biplane videofluoroscopy was used to obtain 4D marker coordinates before and during acute proximal left circumflex artery occlusion. Regional mitral orifice area (MOA) was calculated in the anterior (Ant-MOA), middle (Mid-MOA), and posterior (Post-MOA) mitral orifice segments during early systole (EarlyS), mid systole (MidS), and end systole (EndS). MOA was normalized to zero (minimum orifice opening) at baseline EndS. Tenting height was the distance of the midpoint of paired markers to the mitral annular plane at EndS. RESULTS: Acute ischemia increased echocardiographic MR grade (0.5+/-0.3 vs 2.3+/-0.7, p<0.01) and MOA in all regions at EarlyS, MidS, and EndS: Ant-MOA (7+/-10 vs 22+/-19 mm(2), 1+/-2 vs 18+/-16 mm(2), 0 vs 17+/-15 mm(2)); Mid-MOA (9+/-13 vs 25+/-17 mm(2), 3+/-6 vs 21+/-19 mm(2), 0 vs 25+/-17 mm(2)); and Post-MOA (8+/-10 vs 25+/-16, 2+/-4 vs 22+/-13 mm(2), 0 vs 23+/-13 mm(2)), all p<0.05. There was no change in MOA throughout systole (EarlyS vs MidS vs EndS) during baseline conditions or ischemia. Tenting height increased with ischemia near the central and the anterior commissure leaflet edges (B(1)-B(2): 7.1+/-1.8mm vs 7.9+/-1.7 mm, C(1)-C(2): 6.9+/-1.3mm vs 8.0+/-1.5mm, both p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MOA during ischemia was larger throughout systole, indicating that acute IMR in this setting is a holosystolic phenomenon. Despite discrete postero-lateral myocardial ischemia, Post-MOA was not disproportionately larger. Acute ovine IMR was associated with leaflet restriction near the central and the anterior commissure leaflet edges. This entire constellation of annular, valvular, and subvalvular ischemic alterations should be considered in the approach to mitral repair for IMR.
Authors: Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Benjamin M Jackson; Yoshiharu Enomoto; Martin G St John-Sutton; L Henry Edmunds Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Joseph H Dayan; Aaron Oliker; Ram Sharony; F Gregory Baumann; Aubrey Galloway; Stephen B Colvin; D Craig Miller; Eugene A Grossi Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: David T Lai; Tomasz A Timek; Frederick A Tibayan; G Randall Green; George T Daughters; David Liang; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Frederick A Tibayan; Ariane Wilson; David T M Lai; Tomasz A Timek; Paul Dagum; Filiberto Rodriguez; Mary K Zasio; David Liang; George T Daughters; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: J Heart Valve Dis Date: 2007-01
Authors: Frederick A Tibayan; Filiberto Rodriguez; Mary K Zasio; Lynn Bailey; David Liang; George T Daughters; Frank Langer; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E Messas; J L Guerrero; M D Handschumacher; C M Chow; S Sullivan; E Schwammenthal; R A Levine Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-10-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David T Lai; Frederick A Tibayan; Truls Myrmel; Tomasz A Timek; Paul Dagum; George T Daughters; David Liang; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-09-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert J Schneider; Douglas P Perrin; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Gerald R Marx; Pedro J del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2011-12-04 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Robert J Schneider; Douglas P Perrin; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Gerald R Marx; Pedro J del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Wolfgang Bothe; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Elizabeth H Stephens; Julia C Swanson; David H Liang; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Wolfgang Bothe; Daniel B Ennis; Carl Johan Carlhäll; Tom C Nguyen; Tomasz A Timek; David T Lai; Akinobu Itoh; Neil B Ingels; D Craig Miller Journal: J Heart Valve Dis Date: 2009-11