Literature DB >> 18320935

The balance between NRTI discrimination and excision drives the susceptibility of HIV-1 RT mutants K65R, M184V and K65r+M184V.

John K Ly1, Nicolas A Margot, Holly L MacArthur, Magdeleine Hung, Michael D Miller, Kirsten L White.   

Abstract

The HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) resistance mutations K65R and M184V occur individually and in combination, and can contribute to decreased treatment responses in patients. In order to understand how these mutations interact with one another to confer drug resistance, the susceptibilities and underlying resistance mechanisms of these mutants to nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) were determined. Virus carrying K65R have reduced susceptibility to most NRTIs, but retain full susceptibility to zidovudine (AZT). M184V mutants have reduced susceptibility to lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC) and didanosine (ddl), and contribute to reduced susceptibility to abacavir; however, they remain fully susceptible to tenofovir (TFV), AZT and stavudine (d4T). In cell culture, the K65R+M184V virus showed slightly increased susceptibility to TFV, AZT and d4T compared with K65R alone, but showed further decreases in susceptibility to 3TC, FTC, ddl and abacavir. There are two major biochemical mechanisms of resistance: altered NRTI binding/incorporation and altered NRTI excision after incorporation. For most NRTIs, the primary mechanism of resistance by K65R, M184V and K65R+M184V mutant RTs is to disrupt the NRTI-binding/incorporation steps. In the case of AZT, however, decreased binding/incorporation by K65R and K65R+M184V was counteracted by decreased AZT excision resulting in wild-type susceptibility. For TFV, decreased excision by K65R and K65R+M184V may partially counteract the K65R-driven decrease in incorporation relative to wild-type resulting in only low levels of TFV resistance. The K65R-mediated effect on decreasing NRTI excision was stronger than for M184V. These studies show that both mechanisms of resistance (binding/incorporation and excision) must be considered when defining resistance mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18320935     DOI: 10.1177/095632020701800603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antivir Chem Chemother        ISSN: 0956-3202


  22 in total

1.  In vitro cross-resistance profile of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) BMS-986001 against known NRTI resistance mutations.

Authors:  Zhufang Li; Brian Terry; William Olds; Tricia Protack; Carol Deminie; Beatrice Minassian; Beata Nowicka-Sans; Yongnian Sun; Ira Dicker; Carey Hwang; Max Lataillade; George J Hanna; Mark Krystal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Subtype-specific analysis of the K65R substitution in HIV-1 that confers hypersusceptibility to a novel nucleotide-competing reverse transcriptase inhibitor.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Xu; Susan P Colby-Germinario; Peter K Quashie; Richard Bethell; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A cell-based strategy to assess intrinsic inhibition efficiencies of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Authors:  Michael E Abram; Manuel Tsiang; Kirsten L White; Christian Callebaut; Michael D Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Effects of the W153L substitution in HIV reverse transcriptase on viral replication and drug resistance to multiple categories of reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Xu; Susan P Colby-Germinario; Maureen Oliveira; Daniel Rajotte; Richard Bethell; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Characterization of HIV-1 Resistance to Tenofovir Alafenamide In Vitro.

Authors:  Nicolas A Margot; Audun Johnson; Michael D Miller; Christian Callebaut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dissociates during strand transfer.

Authors:  John M Muchiri; Sean T Rigby; Laura A Nguyen; Baek Kim; Robert A Bambara
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  The K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: genetic barriers, resistance profile and clinical implications.

Authors:  Bluma G Brenner; Dimitrios Coutsinos
Journal:  HIV Ther       Date:  2009-11-01

8.  Molecular mechanism of HIV-1 resistance to 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxyguanosine.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Meteer; Raymond F Schinazi; John W Mellors; Nicolas Sluis-Cremer
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.970

9.  HIV type-1 clade C resistance genotypes in treatment-naive patients and after first virological failure in a large community antiretroviral therapy programme.

Authors:  Catherine Orrell; Rochelle P Walensky; Elena Losina; Jennifer Pitt; Kenneth A Freedberg; Robin Wood
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Should we fear resistance from tenofovir/emtricitabine preexposure prophylaxis?

Authors:  Urvi M Parikh; John W Mellors
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.