Literature DB >> 25403670

A cell-based strategy to assess intrinsic inhibition efficiencies of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Michael E Abram1, Manuel Tsiang2, Kirsten L White2, Christian Callebaut2, Michael D Miller2.   

Abstract

During HIV-1 reverse transcription, there are increasing opportunities for nucleos(t)ide (NRTI) or nonnucleoside (NNRTI) reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors to stop elongation of the nascent viral DNA (vDNA). In addition, RT inhibitors appear to influence the kinetics of vDNA synthesis differently. While cell-free kinetic inhibition constants have provided detailed mechanistic insight, these assays are dependent on experimental conditions that may not mimic the cellular milieu. Here we describe a novel cell-based strategy to provide a measure of the intrinsic inhibition efficiencies of clinically relevant RT inhibitors on a per-stop-site basis. To better compare inhibition efficiencies among HIV-1 RT inhibitors that can stop reverse transcription at any number of different stop sites, their basic probability, p, of getting stopped at any potential stop site was determined. A relationship between qPCR-derived 50% effective inhibitory concentrations (EC50s) and this basic probability enabled determination of p by successive approximation. On a per-stop-site basis, tenofovir (TFV) exhibited 1.4-fold-greater inhibition efficiency than emtricitabine (FTC), and as a class, both NRTIs exhibited an 8- to 11-fold greater efficiency than efavirenz (EFV). However, as more potential stops sites were considered, the probability of reverse transcription failing to reach the end of the template approached equivalence between both classes of RT inhibitors. Overall, this novel strategy provides a quantitative measure of the intrinsic inhibition efficiencies of RT inhibitors in the natural cellular milieu and thus may further understanding of drug efficacy. This approach also has applicability for understanding the impact of viral polymerase-based inhibitors (alone or in combination) in other virus systems.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403670      PMCID: PMC4335843          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04163-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  60 in total

1.  RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of RNA tumour viruses.

Authors:  D Baltimore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of Rous sarcoma virus.

Authors:  H M Temin; S Mizutani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Real-time quantitative PCR assays for detection and monitoring of pathogenic human viruses in immunosuppressed pediatric patients.

Authors:  F Watzinger; M Suda; S Preuner; R Baumgartinger; K Ebner; L Baskova; H G M Niesters; A Lawitschka; T Lion
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Enhanced impairment of chain elongation by inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase in cell-free reactions yielding longer DNA products.

Authors:  Y Quan; C Liang; P Inouye; M A Wainberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The A62V and S68G mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase partially restore the replication defect associated with the K65R mutation.

Authors:  Evguenia S Svarovskaia; Joy Y Feng; Nicolas A Margot; Florence Myrick; Derrick Goodman; John K Ly; Kirsten L White; Nilima Kutty; Ruth Wang; Katyna Borroto-Esoda; Michael D Miller
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 6.  Mechanisms of inhibition of HIV replication by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Authors:  Nicolas Sluis-Cremer; Gilda Tachedjian
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.303

7.  Mechanism and fidelity of HIV reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  W M Kati; K A Johnson; L F Jerva; K S Anderson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  In vitro selection and characterization of HIV-1 with reduced susceptibility to PMPA.

Authors:  M A Wainberg; M D Miller; Y Quan; H Salomon; A S Mulato; P D Lamy; N A Margot; K E Anton; J M Cherrington
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  1999

9.  The triple combination of tenofovir, emtricitabine and efavirenz shows synergistic anti-HIV-1 activity in vitro: a mechanism of action study.

Authors:  Joy Y Feng; John K Ly; Florence Myrick; Derrick Goodman; Kirsten L White; Evguenia S Svarovskaia; Katyna Borroto-Esoda; Michael D Miller
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.602

10.  Histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin induces HIV expression in CD4 T cells from patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy at concentrations achieved by clinical dosing.

Authors:  Datsen George Wei; Vicki Chiang; Elizabeth Fyne; Mini Balakrishnan; Tiffany Barnes; Michael Graupe; Joseph Hesselgesser; Alivelu Irrinki; Jeffrey P Murry; George Stepan; Kirsten M Stray; Angela Tsai; Helen Yu; Jonathan Spindler; Mary Kearney; Celsa A Spina; Deborah McMahon; Jacob Lalezari; Derek Sloan; John Mellors; Romas Geleziunas; Tomas Cihlar
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  1 in total

1.  Determining 3'-Termini and Sequences of Nascent Single-Stranded Viral DNA Molecules during HIV-1 Reverse Transcription in Infected Cells.

Authors:  Darja Pollpeter; Andrew Sobala; Michael H Malim
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 1.355

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.