Literature DB >> 18320723

Arousal and activation effects on physiological and behavioral responding during a continuous performance task.

S Mohammad VaezMousavi1, Robert J Barry, Jacqueline A Rushby, Adam R Clarke.   

Abstract

Based on previous work indicating different neural substrates, two aspects of energetic state, "arousal" and "activation", have been conceptualized separately in our laboratory. "Arousal" has been defined as the energetic state at any particular time, and task-related "activation" as the task-related change in state from resting baseline to the task situation. Both are reflected in electrodermal activity and measured by skin conductance level. Our previous studies in this area have indicated that physiological responses to stimuli in a task are dependent on the arousal level at the time of stimulus presentation, rather than the task-related activation. In contrast, performance on the task is dependent on the task-related activation, rather than the current arousal level. That is, different aspects of the individual's state determine physiological and behavioral responses. Those studies had examined between-subjects differences in arousal and activation. The present study investigated the relevance of this separation in an across-subjects examination of fluctuations in arousal and activation, and their effects on physiological and behavioral responses, during a continuous performance task. It was found that the magnitude of the phasic orienting reflex to the targets during the task was dependent mainly on arousal, rather than task-related relative activation. Reaction time improved with increasing relative activation, but not with arousal. These findings support our earlier conclusions relating to the usefulness of arousal and activation as distinguishable features of the energetics of physiological and behavioral functions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18320723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)        ISSN: 0065-1400            Impact factor:   1.579


  8 in total

1.  Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Kenneth Chelette; Robert D Skinner; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.579

2.  Caffeine Effects on ERP Components and Performance in an Equiprobable Auditory Go/NoGo Task.

Authors:  Robert J Barry; Frances M De Blasio; Adele E Cave
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2014-09-01

3.  Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Martin Wieser; Lilith Buetler; Heike Vallery; Judith Schaller; Andreas Mayr; Markus Kofler; Leopold Saltuari; Daniel Zutter; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Water immersion decreases sympathetic skin response during color-word Stroop test.

Authors:  Daisuke Sato; Yudai Yamazaki; Akari Takahashi; Yoshihito Uetake; Saki Nakano; Kaho Iguchi; Yasuhiro Baba; Rio Nara; Yoshimitsu Shimoyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Skin Conductance Responses Indicate Children are Physiologically Aroused by Their Favourite Branded Food and Drink Products.

Authors:  Rachel Smith; Bridget Kelly; Heather Yeatman; Stuart Johnstone; Louise Baur; Lesley King; Emma Boyland; Kathy Chapman; Clare Hughes; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Hyper-arousal decreases human visual thresholds.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Philip Wirtz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The mechanism of dishabituation.

Authors:  Genevieve Z Steiner; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-14

8.  White Matter Changes Associated with Resting Sympathetic Tone in Frontotemporal Dementia vs. Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez; Aditi Joshi; Madelaine Daianu; Elvira Jimenez; Paul Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.