Literature DB >> 18320316

Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with non-specific changes of the pancreas on computed tomography: a single-center experience.

Shailender Singh1, Savio Reddymasu, Sana Waheed, Melissa Vail, Jianghua He, Jyotsna Talapaneni, Mojtaba Olyaee.   

Abstract

Inconclusive findings on abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scans such as "enlarged or prominent pancreas" are commonly reported; however, their clinical significance is not clearly understood. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in a cohort of patients with indeterminate findings on CT. We undertook a retrospective, single-center study at a tertiary care university hospital. About 107 consecutive patients (56 men) underwent EUS evaluation for inconclusive CT findings. The main intervention was EUS with fine needle aspiration (FNA) The main outcome measurement was to describe lesions identified by EUS in this cohort of patients. About 22 patients (21%) had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 14 (13%) had chronic pancreatitis, 28 (26%) had benign lesions, and 35 patients (33%) had a normal EUS exam. Pancreatic cancer was more likely to be found on EUS in patients with significant weight loss (OR 10.1; 95% CI: 3.3-30.60), hyperbilirubinemia (OR 9; 95% CI: 3-26.0), or common bile duct (CBD) dilatation (OR 3.2; 95% CI: 1.25-8.5). The limitations of the study were that we were unable to control the uniformity of CT interpretation because the scans were reviewed by multiple radiologists. There were also limited follow-up data on patients who had benign lesions or normal EUS. In conclusion, EUS is an effective modality for evaluating pancreatic lesions in patients with inconclusive findings on abdominal CT. This assists in the prompt diagnosis and institution of appropriate treatment strategies for a variety of pancreatic diseases including cancer. In the setting of inconclusive CT findings, patients with hyperbilirubinemia, significant weight loss, or CBD dilatation should undergo EUS evaluation as they are at a higher risk of having underlying pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18320316     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0204-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  21 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  T Rösch; R Lorenz; C Braig; S Feuerbach; J R Siewert; V Schusdziarra; M Classen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  P Protiva; A V Sahai; B Agarwal
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Familial pancreatic cancer: a review.

Authors:  H T Lynch; T Smyrk; S E Kern; R H Hruban; C J Lightdale; S J Lemon; J F Lynch; L R Fusaro; R M Fusaro; P Ghadirian
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  The value of modern ultrasonographic techniques and computed tomography in detecting and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S Kłek; J Kulig; T Popiela; P Kołodziejczyk; P Szybiński; T J Popiela; A Urbanik
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.090

5.  EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  H R Mertz; P Sechopoulos; D Delbeke; S D Leach
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Pancreatic tumors: role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2004

7.  Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography.

Authors:  Antonio Soriano; Antoni Castells; Carmen Ayuso; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Maria Teresa de Caralt; Maria Angels Ginès; Maria Isabel Real; Rosa Gilabert; Llorenç Quintó; Antoni Trilla; Faust Feu; Xavier Montanyà; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Salvador Navarro
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Alcohol consumption and heavy drinking: a survey in three Italian villages.

Authors:  I Guerrini; C Gentili; M Guazzelli
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 2.826

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Banke Agarwal; Emad Abu-Hamda; Kimber L Molke; Arlene M Correa; Linus Ho
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Staging of pancreatic cancer. Analysis of literature results.

Authors:  T Rösch
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1995-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pancreato-biliary malignancy diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography in absence of a mass lesion on transabdominal imaging: prevalence and predictors.

Authors:  Savio C Reddymasu; Neil Gupta; Shailender Singh; Melissa Oropeza-Vail; Syed Faisal Jafri; Mojtaba Olyaee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Bhavana B Rao; Emmanuel Ugbarugba; Zarine K Shah; Alecia Blaszczak; Alice Hinton; Darwin L Conwell; Phil A Hart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.