Literature DB >> 21188524

Pancreato-biliary malignancy diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography in absence of a mass lesion on transabdominal imaging: prevalence and predictors.

Savio C Reddymasu1, Neil Gupta, Shailender Singh, Melissa Oropeza-Vail, Syed Faisal Jafri, Mojtaba Olyaee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Pancreatic cancer is diagnosed in some patients by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) even in the absence of an obvious mass lesion on transabdominal imaging studies. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PBM on EUS-FNA in patients with no obvious mass on transabdominal imaging and identify possible predictors of PBM in this cohort of patients.
METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-six patients (219 female; mean age: 57) with no obvious neoplastic lesion on trans-abdominal imaging underwent EUS. Demographic data, indication of EUS, history of weight loss, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, cholecystectomy status, CT and USG findings, and liver function tests (LFTs) were reviewed.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (9%) were diagnosed with a PBM by EUS-FNA (27 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, three ampullary adenocarcinoma). The mean age of patients diagnosed with PBM was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than controls. The mean size of the tumor was 2.8 cm (range: 0.9-7 cm). Male gender, presence of jaundice, abnormal LFTs, weight loss, and nonspecific trans-abdominal imaging results such as dilated common bile duct (CBD), and abnormal appearing pancreas predicted the presence (P < 0.05) of PBM, whereas patients with previous cholecystectomy and abdominal pain were less likely to have this diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal trans-abdominal imaging does not completely exclude the presence of PBM. Nonspecific pancreatic abnormalities and CBD dilation on trans-abdominal imaging, with jaundice, abnormal LFTs, weight loss, and lack of abdominal pain are predictors of PBM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21188524     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1511-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

1.  Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall; H D Saeger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent controversies and current practice.

Authors:  Curtis J Wray; Syed A Ahmad; Jeffrey B Matthews; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Evaluation of the bilio-pancreatic region using endoscopic ultrasonography in patients referred with and without abdominal pain and CA 19-9 serum level elevation.

Authors:  Jose Luis Ulla Rocha; Maria Victoria Alvarez Sanchez; Javier Paz Esquete; Estela Fernandez Salgado; Carlos Alvarez Alvarez; Manuel Javier Vazquez Sanluis; Luis Ledo Barro; Enrique Vazquez Astray
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2007-03-10

Review 4.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dewitt; Benedict M Devereaux; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease--its influence on surgical decision-making. An update 2008.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Andreas Adler; Ulf Neumann; Peter Neuhaus; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  EUS and/or EUS-guided FNA in patients with CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings of enlarged pancreatic head or dilated pancreatic duct with or without a dilated common bile duct.

Authors:  Banke Agarwal; Naveen B Krishna; Jennifer L Labundy; Rizwan Safdar; Ece I Akduman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Banke Agarwal; Emad Abu-Hamda; Kimber L Molke; Arlene M Correa; Linus Ho
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Saila P Kauhanen; Gaber Komar; Marko P Seppänen; Kirsti I Dean; Heikki R Minn; Sami A Kajander; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Kalle Alanen; Ronald J Borra; Pauli A Puolakkainen; Pirjo Nuutila; Jari T Ovaska
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; K D Lillemoe; J V Sitzmann; R H Hruban; S N Goodman; W C Dooley; J Coleman; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Bhavana B Rao; Emmanuel Ugbarugba; Zarine K Shah; Alecia Blaszczak; Alice Hinton; Darwin L Conwell; Phil A Hart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Evaluation of Undetermined Etiology of Common Bile Duct Dilatation on Abdominal Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh; Naimeh Nejati; Maryam Farsinejad; Shadi Kolahdoozan
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2016-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.