Literature DB >> 18319413

Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.

Roy M Soetikno1, Tonya Kaltenbach, Robert V Rouse, Walter Park, Anamika Maheshwari, Tohru Sato, Suzanne Matsui, Shai Friedland.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Prevention has focused on the detection and removal of polypoid neoplasms. Data are limited on the significance of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs).
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of NP-CRNs in a veterans hospital population and to characterize their association with colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cross-sectional study at a veterans hospital in California with 1819 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy from July 2003 to June 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endoscopic appearance, location, size, histology, and depth of invasion of neoplasms.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of NP-CRNs was 9.35% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 8.05%-10.78%; n = 170). The prevalence of NP-CRNs in the subpopulations for screening, surveillance, and symptoms was 5.84% (95% CI, 4.13%-8.00%; n = 36), 15.44% (95% CI, 12.76%-18.44%; n = 101), and 6.01% (95% CI, 4.17%-8.34%; n = 33), respectively. The overall prevalence of NP-CRNs with in situ or submucosal invasive carcinoma was 0.82% (95% CI, 0.46%-1.36%; n = 15); in the screening population, the prevalence was 0.32% (95% CI, 0.04%-1.17%; n = 2). Overall, NP-CRNs were more likely to contain carcinoma (odds ratio, 9.78; 95% CI, 3.93-24.4) than polypoid lesions, irrespective of the size. The positive size-adjusted association of NP-CRNs with in situ or submucosal invasive carcinoma was also observed in subpopulations for screening (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.27-15.3) and surveillance (odds ratio, 63.7; 95% CI, 9.41-431). The depressed type had the highest risk (33%). Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms containing carcinoma were smaller in diameter as compared with the polypoid ones (mean [SD] diameter, 15.9 [10.2] mm vs 19.2 [9.6] mm, respectively). The procedure times did not change appreciably as compared with historical controls.
CONCLUSION: In this group of veteran patients, NP-CRNs were relatively common lesions diagnosed during routine colonoscopy and had a greater association with carcinoma compared with polypoid neoplasms, irrespective of size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18319413     DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  162 in total

1.  Probability model for estimating colorectal polyp progression rates.

Authors:  Chaitra Gopalappa; Selen Aydogan-Cremaschi; Tapas K Das; Seza Orcun
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-10-05

2.  Endoscopic Management of Complex Lesions in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2021-03

3.  Improving lesion detection during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-10

4.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Improving Endoscopic Adherence to Quality Metrics in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan J Lu; Christopher H Decker; Sean E Connolly
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

6.  Chromocolonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: Dive into the Big Blue.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

Review 7.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 8.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.