Literature DB >> 18318610

Head and eye movements and the role of memory limitations in a visual search paradigm.

Gregor Hardiess1, Sabine Gillner, Hanspeter A Mallot.   

Abstract

The image information guiding visual behavior is acquired and maintained in an interplay of gaze shifts and visual short-term memory (VSTM). If storage capacity of VSTM is exhausted, gaze shifts can be used to regain information not currently represented in memory. By varying the separation between relevant image regions, S. Inamdar and M. Pomplun (2003) demonstrated a trade-off between VSTM storage and gaze shifts, which were performed as pure eye movements, that is, without a head movement component. Here we extend this paradigm to larger gaze shifts involving both eye and head movements. We use a comparative visual search paradigm with two relevant image regions and region separation as independent variable. Image regions were defined by two cupboards displaying colored geometrical objects in roughly equal arrangements. Subjects were asked to find differences in the arrangement of the objects in the two cupboards. Cupboard separation was varied between 30 degrees and 120 degrees . Images were presented with two projectors on a 150 degrees x 70 degrees curved screen. Head and eye movements were simultaneously recorded with an ART head tracker and an ASL mobile eye tracker, respectively. In the large separation conditions, the number of gaze shifts between the two cupboards was reduced, while fixation duration increased. Furthermore, the head movement proportions negatively correlated with the number of gaze shifts and positively correlated with fixation duration. We conclude that the visual system uses increased VSTM involvement to avoid gaze movements and in particular movements of the head. Scan path analysis revealed two subject-specific strategies (encode left, compare right, and vice versa), which were consistently used in all separation conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318610     DOI: 10.1167/8.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Eye-response lags during a continuous monitoring task.

Authors:  Christina J Howard; Tom Troscianko; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Jonathan Samir Matthis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  The effects of circadian phase, time awake, and imposed sleep restriction on performing complex visual tasks: evidence from comparative visual search.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Edward J Silva; Joseph M Ronda; Sean W Cain; Mirjam Y Münch; Charles A Czeisler; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Visual search for category sets: tradeoffs between exploration and memory.

Authors:  Melissa M Kibbe; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Acquisition vs. memorization trade-offs are modulated by walking distance and pattern complexity in a large-scale copying paradigm.

Authors:  Gregor Hardiess; Kai Basten; Hanspeter A Mallot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Learning the optimal control of coordinated eye and head movements.

Authors:  Sohrab Saeb; Cornelius Weber; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Memory shapes visual search strategies in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Scanning behavior in echolocating common pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus).

Authors:  Anna-Maria Seibert; Jens C Koblitz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Suspiciousness perception in dynamic scenes: a comparison of CCTV operators and novices.

Authors:  Christina J Howard; Tom Troscianko; Iain D Gilchrist; Ardhendu Behera; David C Hogg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.