BACKGROUND: To investigate the renoprotective effects and safety of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) for patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease. METHODS: An ARB, candesartan cilexetil, was administered to 13 patients (ARB group, n = 7; control group, n = 6) with a serum creatinine level of 2.52-5.95 mg/dl whose blood pressure had been maintained below 140/90 mmHg by the use of drugs other than ARBs. Routine measurements were conducted for 48 weeks, and renal survival analysis was observed for up to 3 years with the endpoints being doubling of the serum creatinine level, entry to hemodialysis, or death. The results were compared with those of the control group that was not treated with ARB. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in the blood pressure in either group. Proteinuria significantly decreased from 0.95 +/- 0.51 to 0.39 +/- 0.12 g/day (paired t test, P = 0.033) in the ARB group, but did not change in the control group. Creatinine clearance in the control group decreased significantly from 16.2 +/- 5.7 to 10.4 +/- 4.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (paired t test, P = 0.011), but did not change in the other group. Thus, the slopes of the reciprocal serum creatinine values became less steep in the ARB group as compared with the control (-0.002 +/- 0.015 vs. -0.025 +/- 0.015 dl/mg per month; unpaired t test, P = 0.019). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that ARB exhibited more favorable renal outcome at 3 years (log-rank, P = 0.025). No serious adverse events were noted in the study. CONCLUSION: These results show that ARB reduces proteinuria and protects renal function even in the advanced renal failure.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To investigate the renoprotective effects and safety of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) for patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease. METHODS: An ARB, candesartan cilexetil, was administered to 13 patients (ARB group, n = 7; control group, n = 6) with a serum creatinine level of 2.52-5.95 mg/dl whose blood pressure had been maintained below 140/90 mmHg by the use of drugs other than ARBs. Routine measurements were conducted for 48 weeks, and renal survival analysis was observed for up to 3 years with the endpoints being doubling of the serum creatinine level, entry to hemodialysis, or death. The results were compared with those of the control group that was not treated with ARB. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in the blood pressure in either group. Proteinuria significantly decreased from 0.95 +/- 0.51 to 0.39 +/- 0.12 g/day (paired t test, P = 0.033) in the ARB group, but did not change in the control group. Creatinine clearance in the control group decreased significantly from 16.2 +/- 5.7 to 10.4 +/- 4.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (paired t test, P = 0.011), but did not change in the other group. Thus, the slopes of the reciprocal serum creatinine values became less steep in the ARB group as compared with the control (-0.002 +/- 0.015 vs. -0.025 +/- 0.015 dl/mg per month; unpaired t test, P = 0.019). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that ARB exhibited more favorable renal outcome at 3 years (log-rank, P = 0.025). No serious adverse events were noted in the study. CONCLUSION: These results show that ARB reduces proteinuria and protects renal function even in the advanced renal failure.
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Guillermo Pérez De Lema; Cor De Wit; Clemens D Cohen; Elena Nieto; Ana Molina; Bernhard Banas; Bruno Luckow; Ana B Vicente; Francisco Mampaso; Detlef Schlöndorff Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: M J Klag; P K Whelton; B L Randall; J D Neaton; F L Brancati; C E Ford; N B Shulman; J Stamler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-01-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Juan P Casas; Weiliang Chua; Stavros Loukogeorgakis; Patrick Vallance; Liam Smeeth; Aroon D Hingorani; Raymond J MacAllister Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-10 Impact factor: 79.321